2017년 3월 2일 목요일

Yamada sentence

Yamada sentence

The Yamada sentence (やまだあや, 1967 -) is a Japanese jurist. A professor at Kyoto University. I analyze the side that these realize the autonomy of the person concerned in a civil affair dispute processing procedure, the system and the relationship with the role of the procedure president (courts) as a central problem from a model theory and an actual situation theory and study it [1].

Table of contents

Person

Tohoku UniversityThe law departmentA native place. The choice of a university, the department was a reason negative at all that chose the department which looked good of the rate of employment even as in the national university which could go from the parents' house at the time in a 5-minute walk and a girl. As for the undergraduate era, I did nothing but circle activity (simulated trial) day in and day out, and, as for the examination, most were greens pickled overnight. I was not interested in the bar examination and intended to find a job early for economical independence, and the job hunting was finished in the summer of the fourth grader and was the situation that I hesitated about between the informal decisions that there was multiple afterward. However, I do decision to remain in the university partly because I know difficulty and the fun of document, 文献渉猟 by the seminar of the Civil Proceedings Act that entered in those days, and I was invited to an assistant by a professor. I choose "an alternative dispute resolution procedure" as a theme of the assistant article, but it has been a relatively still new field in those days and has a hard fight. In the night and day, I read Japan-U.S. documents, and it made a breakthrough somehow to talk with the cat of the yard at midnight when it was daily life for the days such as the relaxation, and the design of the article came to be born. I learned the buoyancy that kept encouraging oneself without objective grounds from this experience [2].

For the concrete content of the study, it is the method of rules of the principle of official authority detection, the official authority taking of evidence, the significance of the suit contract including the evidence restrictions contract, the engine theory in the bankruptcy procedure, significance of the law in arbitration, the mediation procedure, adjustment type ADR and a method of the cooperation of the cutting type procedure. In addition, the law of the ADR procedure continues a comparison method study about becoming it and the limit. Furthermore, in a collaborative form with a businessman and a researcher of other specialty, I perform actual situation analysis of the use of the civil action procedure, each country comparison of a housework case procedure, the housework mediation system, the examination of the system theory including the way of the medical care dispute solution procedure [3].

Brief career history

  • I am born - in 1967
  • 1990 - Tohoku University law department graduation, the assistant
Through assistant at Okayama University law department, assistant professor, Kyoto University graduate school law graduate course assistant professor
  • Present - professor

Position society

Writing

Single work

Joint work

Cocompilation

Footnote

Outside link

It is acquired by "https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= Yamada sentence &oldid=59922324"

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Yamada sentence

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기

피드 구독하기: 댓글 (Atom)