QC story

Inspection is demanded about the reliability of the contents of this article. Please show the one knowing documents and a source of information for confirmation. I specify the source, and I would like cooperation to raise the reliability of the article. Please refer to a notebook for the discussion. (December, 2009)

With the QC story, I say a procedure of the activity based on the component called "theme" "reason "grasp "analysis" "drafting "enforcement "confirmation "brake" "left problem and process of the effect" of measures" of measures" of the present conditions" that I took up" of future" or the announcement about a solution to the problem in QC. I may include "the setting of the aim" in a component.

Each component protects the order, and be active, and announce または and mean. Therefore, it is a mistake to let I distribute entry paper (fixed form paper) which I made by such an order beforehand, and a result of the activity fill it out.

Table of contents

Kind

Generally,

1. A type to take measures against on the heels of a cause "a solution to the problem type,"
2. Architectural approach "problems molding,"
3. The case that can see a cause and measures "a measure practice model"

I call it, but the business considerably varies in と.

Kind in the business

1. The solution to the problem type is divided into measures precedence model" to take measures against several factors doubtful to some extent before establishing "a cause decision model" to examine measures if I do not make a cause clear, and not to carry out and a cause. In the latter case, I establish a cause after taking measures.
2. In addition, there is "the consecutive measures model" that I find "the model that collects it, and includes it" to draw up measures after saving a factor in a figure of characteristic factor, and being crowded and a factor and gradually take measures against and is used as an activity procedure by business widely. The former assumes the combination of standards of each factor a problem and often evaluates influence in a multiple regression analysis and orthogonality sequence list about the factor that saves it, and was crowded and often performs it when the latter is a factor of each independence.
3. There is the thing which should call itself a preventive model and in fact a trouble is not up, but is activity to find the factor that may cause the trouble in the future, and to take measures against. I may be the theme to perform only this activity, but often perform it in a solution to the problem type. A figure of characteristic factor to use with this preventive model is "a figure of characteristic factor for the management".

Purpose

1. An announcement procedure theory: Because audience was hard to understand and caused difficulty of the marking of the judge every theme if an announcement item and order were different, I should standardize it.
2. An announcement, activity procedure theory: It is said that this procedure is effective as an activity sphere of influence.
3. A model theory: It is said that I show the typical announcement, activity procedure theory pattern that I extremely simplified. Generally it is complicated and cannot cover the activity of the business with the above-mentioned QC story. For example, I correct cause A on one theme and cause B is architectural and solves it, and, in cause C, measure practice carries out a-shaped activity, and generally it is mixed type.

Problems

I may see an instruction example to make "the setting of the aim" for next to "the present grasp" in 1 these days, but am understood when it is an error. It can be improved for little expenditure to where, or the groupuscule activity (QC circle, daily life management) does not know it, but because it is the improvement activity of the purpose "to go to the place to be able to go" to, it is activity not to be afraid of failure, and it plans it (P), and it carries it out (D), and it considers a result (C), and this is because it is based on a management cycle called (A) examining the next action. In other words, failure is approach to think about the next hand by failure. On the other hand, in the case of the blow game that failure is not tolerated like policy management, it is necessary to beat Ishibashi, and an act (goal setting) to confirm "means and the result that there is not the dissatisfaction to of the best and return on investment" beforehand here becomes indispensable, but the setting will be located between "the drafting of measures" and "the enforcement of measures".

I have two situations of 2 about the meaning of "the reason that I took up".

A subjectivity theory: I explain that I point to the reason that I took up as "an activity theme". In other words, it is a meaning, "I explain why you carried out activity". This situation is taken in much announcement examples, but does not mean that this situation is supported. Management (small improvement) is activity to work on all of unreasonableness irregularity waste, and it intends for the theme with the special reason every day, and this is because it is not the activity that the others leave unattended.

An objectivity theory: I shall point to the reason that I took up as "an announcement theme". In other words, it is a meaning, "I explain the reason that chose why you announce the activity for announcement". The QC story is often used in the example announcement of the QC circle, but the QC circle is activity of the management every day and it is natural to be active and does not need a particular reason. Because it is natural that an example not to deserve announcement occupies most and announces it with a choice of "a thing deserving announcement" from the mixture of good and bad things, I explain it when I mean "the reason that I chose for announcement".

The component of the QC story enumerated on 3 protects the order, and be active and is not a meaning to announce または. Therefore, it is a mistake to let I distribute entry paper (fixed form paper) which I made by such an order beforehand, and a result of the activity fill it out.

There is it with 4 "analysis" "drafting "enforcement of measures" of measures", but I draw up measures one by one and may carry it out as soon as I come up with the idea and do not limit it to a factor to mention it later when drafting carries out measures after analysis necessarily completed it.

In the case of effect insufficiency, 5 often returns to the "present grasp" "factor analysis" "drafting of measures" by "the confirmation of the effect" after "the enforcement of measures" again.

This item is an unfinished item in conjunction with engineering, the technique. I demand the cooperator who corrects it, and corrects this item (a Portal: technology and industry).

It is acquired by "https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=QC story &oldid=62095976"

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia QC story

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.