Bible no incorrect idea
 | The question based on the neutral point of view is submitted or is discussing this article. Therefore an article might be comprised of a partial point of view. Please refer to a notebook for the discussion. (June, 2015) |
A premise that the Bible no incorrect idea (せいしょむびゅうせつ, English: Biblical infallibility) is expressed with a word for word no incorrect idea (ちくごむびゅうせつ), a nothing false nothing incorrect idea or literal no incorrect idea and assumes that "the Bible" is no error (there is not an error) absolute requirements. The term which a theologian, a bibliologist, a person of Christ faith use as a Christianity-related term. I am controversial in the theology book and am understood when it is a technical term. It is the accepted doctrine to be basic, and to be concerned with of the creed to be greatly related how Christ person places "the Bible" in in faith or theology or bibliology, and this term is a term prescribing a basic posture of the Bible's way of reading again.
Table of contents
Creed
I explain it assuming being the Christianity-related term which Christ religious sect, a church assuming that I do the Bible as Bible Masanori primarily a creed insist on.
It was the synonym which expressed, "there was not an error" even if I did it in "no error" and a word to say even if I did it in a word to say "mistakenly", but as the discussion about the property advanced to the Bible, the debater Daniel Fuller and others of the Fuller theological college referred the following nuance and came to originally distinguish these words. [1][2]
- "No error:" Not leading it in a reference of the Bible about a creed and the morality by mistake.
- 「Nothing mistakenly」： A thing of the Bible and historic in a scientific reference without wrong contents.
As described above, a certain person insisted only on the former after having been able to make the difference of the meaning between terms when I said, "the Bible does not have an error", and the situation that I insisted on including both sides produced a certain person. And it is general understanding that say that I led to it if "partial, no, sex mistakenly" express the supporter of Limited Inerrancy and both sides namely "no error" situation that "no, false", accepts the nature together with a supporter of "all mark nothing false nature" in a situation insisting only on the "no error" nature of the Bible. However, definitions of these "false no" "nothing errors" in various writing are various, and it is demanded that I read it carefully. In the first place, as for the Chicago statement about no false nature of the Bible, it is the statement from the situation supporting "all mark nothing false nature" because to separate two concepts, and to discuss includes unreasonableness. The Chicago statement says that the nothing false nature is not opposed to infallibility while taking the situation of the nothing false nature.
Phenomenon of the Bible
The scholar taking this situation notices the thing having a problem with between parallelism articles in the Bible since Origenes. But I express such a problem with "phenomena" (phenomena) of the Bible without concluding immediately with "error" (errors) and avoid negation of the nothing false nature [3].
For heresy and the pagan who insisted that the Bible had an error, the point told Justinus "to confess it when I did not understand it" [4]. In addition, Augustine assumed the defect of the manuscript, a problem of translation, lack of one's understanding a reason [5]. Saying that Thomas Aquinas should be convinced of truth characteristics of the Bible unconditionally [6]; [7]
Catholic Church
The Catholic Church is a situation of the Bible no incorrect idea, too, but the reel number of the Bible is different from Protestantism [8].
Criticism
I stand opposite to this, and there is the liberalism theologian who insists to read the Bible freely. Tetsuo Yamaga nominates Bible no incorrect idea for a characteristic of the fundamentalism [9].
The Bible is only the human word that it is wrong, and there is in the situation criticizing Bible no incorrect idea. If "Bible reporter" oneself who wrote the Bible is a human being, and a lot of Bible reporters who absolute, it is "the limited existence with the limit" and wrote the Bible in facing each other with "stupidity" are the things which cannot transcend this stupidity and limitedness with a human being so that it is strongly talked about Bible においてが, the Bible reporter writes the point of the criticism without "even the Bible" said to that I received revelation of God wiping a filter called the human subjectivity not "a head of a brush of God". Besides, it was the meeting that a stupid human being held to have assumed the Bible Masanori, and a human being was decided. Therefore, there is the historic theologian who insists when you should read it critically in the Bible while emphasizing that there is difference in the opinion between everywhere. The viewpoint is called the high review of the liberal, and a document hypothesis is their established theory.
The Bible no incorrect idea is used as a Christianity-related Christianity-related term, but a religious sect exists with the theologian who defines the doctrine that I preach what is written in the Bible for each word if there is not an error at all and ように which just "swallows words whole" should read the Bible when it is "Bible nothing incorrect idea" in the liberal group.
Footnote
- ^ "びぶりか"
- ^ "modern evangelism theology" p.240
- ^ "evangelism Christianity and Gospel group" p.258
- The ^ "talks with the avian phone"
- The ^ "ヒエロニムス collected letters"
- ^ "theology perfection"
- ^ Mikio Wada "being what with the Bible for us" or girl Paul society
- ^ "Doctrine charter Chapter 3 about the revelation of God" comments on "Bible inspiration and Bible interpretation"Mikio Wada
- Written by ^ Tetsuo Yamaga "Christianity that I want to know only illustration this"
Allied documents
- With "an inspiration of the Bible a written by authority" B B Warfield Protestantism publishing company
- Words company ISBN 4773367725 of the written by "Bible Kazuhiko Uchida life that is words of God"
- Words company ISBN 4264020492 of the written by "modern evangelism theology" Susumu Uda life
- Written by "authority Reiji Oyama sheep group company of the Bible"
- "Explaining Inerrancy: A Commentary" Robert Charles sprawl
Allied item
This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Bible no incorrect idea
This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.
In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.
0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기