2017년 1월 23일 월요일

The regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure

The regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure

The regulations (とっとりけんじんけんしんがいきゅうさいすいしんおよびてつづきにかんするじょうれい, 2005 Tottori regulations 94th) about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure are the regulations of Tottori. It was aimed for the first human rights relief in Japan.

I approve it (2005) in Tottori assembly on October 12 in 2005 and am established [1]. I freeze the enforcement by the painful "regulations about the stops such as the regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure" that [1] promulgates it on March 28, 2006 before the enforcement, and were enforced as the regulations (2010) (2006) during "until a day to establish it in the regulations particularly" in a period until March for enforcement .2010 years on June 1 in 2006. It was abolished without being enforced by "the regulations that revised a part of the regulations made with society of the Tottori respect for human rights" enforced on April 1, 2009.

Table of contents

Summary

The regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure say with "I aim that human rights contribute to respected social realization by taking measures about appropriate and quick relief of the damage that is caused by human rights violations or might occur or the effective prevention" (regulations Article 1). In addition, these regulations were only for March 31 (2010), and they were done with an interim law to lose effect in 2010 when measures of extension or other indispensability were not taken.

At first the regulations prohibited slander, an act to slander as "human rights violations" openly for the purpose of reducing the discriminatory handling and behavior to assume races a reason, social trust (regulations Article 2, Article 3).

Then, the regulations decided to establish the human rights relief promotion committee consisting of five committees whom the governor appointed with the approval of an assembly to perform duties about relief of the damage by "human rights violations" and the prevention (regulations Article 4 or less). The committee assumes it a thing "accepting consultation about the problem about human rights violations" and I investigate the hearing from the person concerned and confirm facts and want to notify the person concerned of the findings by letter (regulations Article 16 or less). When this findings had dissatisfaction, I could state reexamination and said that the committee investigated it again. In addition, I decided to sentence you to the correctional fine that was less than 50,000 yen when the person concerned of the case refused an investigation without sufficient reason and disturbed it or evaded it and did not cooperate with an investigation (regulations Article 28 Clause 2).

And I want to take a bailout to raise next when I admit that it is necessary the human rights relief promotion committee relieves the damage by human rights violations based on the result of the investigation or to prevent it (regulations Article 21).

  1. For the person who suffers damage for human rights violations or might receive it and the person concerned (victims), help introduction, mediation and others such as necessary advice, a public institution concerned or the relations private sector.
  2. For the person who performs human rights violations or might perform it or a person performing an act I promote this or to cause and the person concerned (assailants), teach enlightenment and others about the idea of instruction, the respect for human rights about the act concerned.
  3. Plan the adjustment of the relations such as victims and the assailant.
  4. Accuse it about the human rights violations that are considered when I correspond to a crime.

Furthermore, I want to take measures to raise next when I admit that it is necessary I relieve the damage by the human rights violations concerned when I admit that an act to endanger life or a body is open, in fact serious human rights violations such as repeated discriminatory behavior, slander or the slander are performed or the human rights relief promotion committee meeting was performed or to prevent it (regulations Article 24).

  1. Urge it I stop the human rights violations concerned for assailants or not to perform the act like this in the future.
  2. Encourage participation in training about the human rights enlightenment for assailants.

And it was said that I could announce so when the assailants concerned did not obey the advice concerned without sufficient reason though a committee performed this advice. In addition, I decided to make a day in court beforehand before all performed it about this advice, publication (regulations Article 25, Article 26).

History

These regulations assume that Yoshihiro Katayama (Governor of Tottori) expressed "the need of the human rights relief system of the local level" the beginning of the establishment in prefectural assembly general interpellation of June (2002) in 2002. The governor consulted the way of "the human rights relief system of the local level", examination of the regulations plan for "a meeting set up based on "regulations (1996 Tottori regulations 15th) made with society of the Tottori respect for human rights" made with society of the Tottori respect for human rights" (2003) in September in 2003, the following day. The meeting discussed it for the last time (2004) in November in 2004, and, based on this result, Tottori human rights relief procedure regulations plan by the governor suggestion was submitted to the prefectural assembly in December of the year.

Because the regulations plan had contents similar to a protection of human rights bill discussed in the Diet in those days, I received criticism like the criticism for the bill. I insisted on the Tottori bar association after announcing the chairperson of regulations plan statement who pointed out problems, and having broken off problems when you should suggest it to the assembly some other time [2]. I repeated continuous deliberation in an assembly, a February assembly of 2005 (2005), the following day, a June assembly in submitted December, and the "Tottori human rights relief procedure regulations" plan by the governor suggestion became the incomplete deliberation withdrawal in October after all. On the other hand, it was suggested a member of the Diet, and I approved it (2005) in a prefectural assembly on September 12 in 2005, and "regulations plan about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure" that revised the problems that appeared in the deliberation of the "Tottori human rights relief procedure regulations" plan by the governor suggestion was established, and it was decided to enforce it (2006) on June 1 in 2006.

The opinion about the regulations that a large number of criticism arose from the prefecture outdoors when the regulations approval was reported, and were put to Tottori prefectural government office by November 30, the same year of 1,389 [1]. The Tottori bar association announced the chairperson of regulations statement who pointed out problems [3] and decided a general meeting containing the dispatch refusal of the member lawyer for the examination committee of the regulations enforcement regulations for the reorganization of the regulations [4]. Tottori held "the social gathering about the human rights relief regulations" and referred to the opinion of the well-informed person, and "the regulations about the stops such as the regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure" by the governor suggestion were prefectural assemblies, and, based on these opinions, the approval was established (2006) in March in 2006, and it was decided to stop the enforcement as for the regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure during "until a day to establish it in the regulations particularly". The accompanying opinion with "doing it with a minimum during the period to need it to review it while securing transparency, the equitableness of the process of the examination, and enforcing the regulations with the effect immediately" was referred to the regulations about the stop about a review business expense.

I install "human rights relief regulations review examination committee" (committee's chairperson, Masao Nagayama, Tottori University vice president) (2006) in May in 2006. It was held and followed the review of the regulations 18 times (2007) by October in 2007.

Shinji Hirai takes office as the governor with the retirement of Katayama newly (2007) in April in 2007.

In November, "the human rights relief regulations review examination committee" submits the opinion book that included the abolition virtually of the regulations during enforcement freeze to the governor. As a result, the governor showed an opinion that the abolition of the regulations was not avoided.

The governor announces that I suggest regulations plan to abolish the regulations to the assembly in February (2009) in January in 2009.

Because "the regulations that revised a part of the regulations made with society of the Tottori respect for human rights" including the abolition of the human rights violations relief regulations were enforced in a prefectural assembly on approval, establishment, April 1 on March 25, the human rights violations relief regulations were abolished without being enforced.

Footnote

  1. ^ a b "The first human rights regulations establishment Tottori prefectural assembly". Kyodo News Enterprise. 47NEWS. (October 12, 2005). http://www.47news.jp/CN/200510/CN2005101201001327.html October 7, 2012 reading. 
  2. Chairperson statement (2004 (2004) December 7) - Tottori bar association for the ^ Tottori human rights relief procedure regulations plan
  3. Chairperson statement (2005 (2005) October 8) - Tottori bar association for the ^ "regulations plan about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure"
  4. Refuse enforcement regulations examination Committee committee recommendation of the regulations about ^ Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure; general meeting resolution (2005 (2005) December 23) - Tottori bar association for the reorganization of the regulations

Allied item

Outside link

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia The regulations about Tottori human rights violations relief promotion and the procedure

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기