2016년 8월 17일 수요일

Soya Tunnel

Soya Tunnel

The undersea tunnel where Soya Tunnel (I name a tunnel tentatively as soon as it goes) may be built in the future between Hokkaido and Sakhalin (the Japanese name: Karafuto as follows Sakhalin and notation).

Table of contents

Summary

Route (design) that reaches Europe from Tokyo
Station
The European area
Moscow
Baikal Amur railroad・Trans-Siberian Railroad
Japanese parsley Hino (Russian version)
Machtovy
Bimil
Oktyabrsky
Aksyan
Khalsan
Nizhnetambovskoye
Shelekhova
Chernyi mistake
Under a plan
Lazarev
The ネヴェリスコイ straits
The Khabarovsk district/SakhalinBorder
Under a plan
The オハ area
ノグリキ
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
Soya Tunnel (design)
Wakkanai
Soya Main Line, Hakodate Main Line
The Seikan Tunnel
Aomori
Ueno

The name the 稚泊 tunnel (ちはく tunnel) may be used. As a name of the Seikan Tunnel was adopted by the Seikan ferry which links Hakodate to Aomori, this is a name to be associated with 稚泊連絡船 traveled between Wakkanai of Hokkaido and Odomari of Karafuto. In addition, it is expressed Japan and Russia tunnel (にちろ tunnel) with the Hokkaido extension of the Trans-Siberian Railroad again because I bind Japan and Russia together.

The most deep part of Soya Channel (the Russian name: the ラペルザ straits) is approximately 70m on this straight line at approximately 43km between the northernmost part, Soyamisaki of Hokkaido and the southernmost tip, the chestnut Rion cape (the name of the rule era in Japan: Cape west ability Toro) of Sakhalin. A geological feature makes a little difference and, in Hokkaido and Sakhalin, is anticipated when the construction of the tunnel is not more difficult at the technical side than the Seikan Tunnel.

Furthermore, they perform direct driving with the Western Europe area from Japanese railroad and Baikal Amur railroad, not only the direct driving with the Trans-Siberian Railroad but also Moscow to be connected from Makurazaki Station to Europe on the track when I build the undersea tunnel (Sakhalin tunnel) into the Tatary straits (the Japanese name: the Mamiya straits) and incorporate it in Europe and Asia through trains such as the Paris London going from Ueno, and the way station of the big distribution network and the thing doing are put in the field of vision. Actually, construction of the Mamiya Channel Tunnel was started for Stalin Era, but the construction is stopped and reaches it at the present, and in late years there is the movement of the construction resumption afterwards, too.

Movement of the construction promotion

When the from the end of 2000s to 2010s begin, often go up it from the Russia side to the agenda about this plan, and, according to the Russia side, announce it "Japan and (or is discussing it) discussing it", "want to talk", but is ignored virtually without any statement being announced about this plan by people concerned with Japanese Government and JR; is in a condition.

In the first place so far it has not been talked about the construction of this tunnel in Japan and Russia government-to-government formally, but there are the things by the Trans-Siberian Railroad globalization maintenance promotion mechanism start preparatory committee (Chairperson Hidekazu Yamaguchi) as movement of the construction promotion because profitability is not correct at all without population of Sakhalin in itself following a course of the decrease, and population of the whole island being filled to 500,000 after 2010 even if an industry base except the gas field development constructs a tunnel in weak Sakhalin. I finish construction costs cheaply much more even if I compare it with a Japan-Korea tunnel when I compare Europe with Japan for a root to grow, and it is said that the effect is big again.

I stated that アンドレイネドセコフ Under Secretary of Transportation of the Russian Department of Transportation examined possibility about the tunnel construction concerned now on the Russian side on January 16, 2009. In addition, there are a bridge and the design to do not a tunnel.

I announced, "we could build the tunnel to Japan, and we are examining it" after Prime Minister Putin built a bridge in an interview from the Mamiya Strait on December 15, 2011 and showed a feeling of expectation saying "I am related in being fully loaded with Trans-Siberian Railroad with Japanese freight". However, that, according to the aforesaid, there is not the fact examining in the government between Japan and Russia [1].

In addition, in June, 2013, ministry of Far East development in Russia clarified a policy to start construction of the bridge which linked the continent to Sakhalin in 2016. On top of that, I mentioned the design of the section [2].

When they visited Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk in the end of May, it is reported that Sakhalin and Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport already discussed it about the design [2], but, according to the local news of Russia, as for the イシャエフ Far East development aspect, the facts are unidentified a remark saying it "may be bound the point that is important to development of Sakhalin together as for the construction of the bridge with the continent in the future with Japan" without a person concerned with government, JR announcing any statement about this agenda from [broken link], the Japan side together (the situation that cannot but say that I am ignored openly).

About the design that Governor of ホロシャビン of Sakhalin tied up Sakhalin to Hokkaido separated at Soya Channel in a bridge or a tunnel on September 4, 2013, the Russia side talked about possibility, "I study it now" [3]. When Russian Sokolov Minister of Transport would visit Japan in future, I stated, "I talk" about a Japanese side and the possibility of the plan, but did not mention concrete schedules [3]. As for the Governor of ポロシャビン, "the key to investment project makes a reply with profitability of economic effect and the investment" for the coverage by the document of the Mainichi Shimbun [4].

I get out of the Russian side in the topic in spite of the repeated disregard of the Japanese side now. In the ninth world rapid transit railway meeting held in Tokyo in July, 2015, President Vladimir ヤクーニン of the Russian railroad discusses a Japanese delegation and this plan and concludes which "it was a thing letting you hold interest in the reaction on the Japan side, but the absence of the peace treaty of the Russia and Japan interval disturbs the realization of the project" saying "all of us well understand the point where the absence of some political issues particularly peace treaty stops economic cooperation, and, however, I think that this project will get stimulation serious at all if I found the possibility that the present leadership of Japan sees the global situation from a different angle." [5], but what comment is not provided from the person concerned on the Japan side, too.

It is the plan that wants to tie a railway network to the Russia mainland at an undersea tunnel or a bridge in a most narrow part of the Mamiya Strait, but, for a Russian side, high government official and the person concerned with Sakhalin promote this plan positively at the Prime Minister Putin beginning saying that they do not pull it against each other only in Sakhalin and traffic demand only for the Russia mainland economically.

Overheads

According to the investigation and the test calculation of the specialist in Kremlin, 2,500 million dollars, the expense of Soya Tunnel are calculated as a test with 8,000,000,000-10,000,000,000 dollars 2 billion dollars, the complete reform expense of the railroad of Sakhalin the construction expense of a communication bridge of the Mamiya Strait and the branch line from there, and the total sum of the investment of this plan and plan associated with it is estimated with 12,000,000,000-15,000,000,000 dollars. The construction is expected to take seven years [6].

Effect by the construction

The Russian side expects activation of the economy of the Sakhalin and Far East area by trade activation by the supplies transportation with the freight train with Japan from remarks of Prime Minister Putin.

When this plan is realized, 4,000,000-6,000,000 a year containers are transported between Japan and Europe (15-20% of the total container number between Japan and Europe) and calculate it as a test when freight of 18,000,000-20,000,000 tons a year may be transported more between Japan and Russia [4], and the profit is estimated in the year to be provided by these transportation when it is to 3,000,000,000-4,000,000,000 dollars. It is thought that I can let mineral resources, the wood from the vicinity of Trans-Siberian Railroad and Baikal Amur railroad area, development and the export of other nature become active [7].

On the other hand, Hokkaido Railway Co. (Hokkaido Railway) and Japan Freight Railway Co. (JR freight) which are the government and the person concerned do not express what opinion for this plan on the Japanese side either (it is said that the Russian side negotiates with Japan like the aforesaid, but the Japanese side pretends to be disregard); collect it, and it is unknown what kind of effect is anticipated including an aspect whether balances with cost-effectiveness.

Problems, problem

Conventionally, if the introduction of construction and the vehicle of the facilities that a tunnel should be built was done because the width (gauge of a track) of the track was performed laying (it dates back to the rule era in Japan when I arrive in Sakhalin) of at same 1,067mm (narrow gauge) as for the old line from Hokkaido and to the south and most of the railroads of Sakhalin, it was said that the direct driving of the railroad was enabled technically. However, I push forward 改軌 to a 1,520mm gauge of a track (broad gauge) same as Russia now in Sakhalin, and cart exchange or the introduction of free gauge train or the train on train that Hokkaido Railway Co. is under development, measures such as the construction of the piling over again base of the freight are necessary between Sakhalin and Hokkaido when this is completed.

The northern limit of the freight train of Japan Freight Railway Co. becomes north Asahikawa Station and has permission of the second kind railway business to Nayoro Station to Soya Main Line from the station and to the north without a freight train riding it, but is changed to trucking for rationalization now in after September, 1996 (the details refer to an item of "Nayoro Station").

Therefore (because a freight train does not go, it may be said that it is natural) Soya Main Line is not assuming the service of the freight train now and is sure to become the bottleneck in the diagram. The reinforcement of facilities is indispensable for the solution to these problems.

Source

  1. ^ "Tunnel examination "= Sakhalin cross-linked plan to Japan" Prime Minister of reference - Russia"It is asahi.com. A newsletter (Asahi Shimbun). (December 16, 2011). An archive by at original January 20, 2012. It is reading on http://web.archive.org/web/20120120122846/http://www.asahi.com/international/jiji/JJT201112150150.html December 20, 2011. 
  2. ^ a b [1] - Asahi Shimbun June 3, 2013 [broken link]
  3. ^ a b [2] - 47NEWS September 4, 2013 [broken link]
  4. ^ a b Sea boundary, Japan: The 17th Soya Channel - Mainichi Shimbun November 19, 2013
  5. ^ http://jp.sputniknews.com/russia/20150712/566981.html
  6. ^ http://roshianow.jp/business/2013/09/06/44951.html
  7. ^ http://roshianow.jp/business/2013/09/06/44951.html

Allied item

Outside link

It is acquired by "https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= Soya Tunnel &oldid=59772399"

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Soya Tunnel

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기

피드 구독하기: 댓글 (Atom)