2016년 11월 2일 수요일

The 2003 Sapporo mayoral election

The 2003 Sapporo mayoral election

The Sapporo mayoral election is the election that was performed to elect the mayor of Sapporo-shi that is in prefectural seat of Hokkaido and an ordinance-designated city for 2,003 years. A vote was held on April 13, 2003 that was the 15th nationwide local elections first half of the game election day, but re-election was performed on June 8 because there was not the candidate who got the legal vote that was necessary for election. I take up election of April and June in this report in a mass.

Table of contents

Summary

It is election held with Sapporo mayoralty four years having expired. The ruling and opposition parties riding together system except the Japanese Communist Party (the following, the Communist Party) followed since the Sapporo mayoral election was election of 1983, and the Social Democratic Party Japan (the following, the Socialist Party) shelved candidate support. However, record-high seven people ran because the Liberal Democratic Party (the following, the LDP) and the Democratic Party which continued riding together until now supported an each original candidate because Mayor incumbent Nobuo Katsura expressed a non-run this time and did not nominate candidate successor, and the candidate who advocated "independents" again ran in succession. Votes dispersed in the election of April, and a candidate with a legal vote was not, and re-election was performed in June two months later. As a result of re-election, Fumio Ueda with a most vote achieved election in election in April.

April election

Basic data

The riding together system by the LDP and the Democratic Party (including the Socialist Party becoming the forerunner) which followed and the New Komeito collapsed until now, and, by a non-run of the Mayor of Katsura, the LDP and the Democratic Party supported an each original candidate. In what plural candidate independents ran for there, it changed into a confused fight.

  • An election reason: The term of office expiration
  • A notification day:
  • An election day: April 13, 2003
  • The number of the qualified voters: 1,473,297 people
  • A candidate: Seven people
List of candidates (report order)
Candidate name Age Political party The old and the new Recommendation, support political party Careers
Fumio Ueda 54 Independent New face Democratic Party, citizen's network Hokkaido Lawyer 
Koji Akiyama  52 Independent  New face Director of Akiyama memory life sciences promotion foundation, ex-President at Akiyama Aiseikan
Yamaguchi たか  53 Independent New face The cause, Sapporo-shi congressist
Look at the way; Shigenobu 57 Independent New face LDP, New Conservative Party The cause, Sapporo-shi congressist
Yoshiaki Tsuboi  54 Independent New face Professor at Waseda University politics and economics department
Noriyuki Nakao  56 Independent New face The cause, member of the House of Councilors, the Hokkaido media support president
Hirokazu Sato  50 Independent New face The Communist Party Group officer
The source: Number of April 13, 2003 execution Sapporo mayoral election enrollment, the qualified voters (Sapporo-shi board of elections) November 19, 2011 reading

Election results

As a result of election, Fumio Ueda whom Democratic Party and citizen's network Hokkaido (as follows citizen's net) recommended it to came first with more than 170000 votes. However, re-election will be held because I did not reach the legal vote (25% of effective votes) line necessary for election.

  • Turnout: 59.58% of 57.32% (turnout 844,469) of last time turnouts
Election return
Candidate Political party The old and the new The number of votes Vote rate Recommendation, support political party
Fumio Ueda Independent New face 172,512 The Democratic Party, citizen's net
Noriyuki Nakao Independent New face 168,474  
Look at the way; Shigenobu Independent New face 159,787 LDP, New Conservative Party
Takashi Akiyama Independent New face 97,327
Yoshiaki Tsuboi Independent New face 76,405
Yamaguchi たか Independent New face 67,785
Hirokazu Sato Independent New face 54,126 The Communist Party
Effective vote 796,416
Faulty ballot 47,973
Total votes 844,389
The source: "April 13, 2003 execution Sapporo mayoral election vote decision" (all the cities) "April 13, 2003 execution Sapporo mayoral election election return" Sapporo-shi board of elections (November 19, 2011 reading).
A note: 199,104 votes of legal votes necessary for election

As for Ueda who became the top by a vote, other candidates including Nakao were not able to enlarge support under discrete influence a weak body and the democracy substrate of the labor union. Nakao of the second place had the popularity by the candidacy secondary to election last time in 1999, but candidate independents failed to rise under influence jumbled up close together. And seeing it developed the electoral campaign that cooperated with LDP member of a city council and a member of Hokkaido assembly, and a way of the third place planned organization hardening, but was not able to gather wide support. As for thing, Tsuboi whom the camp demanded support from the LDP in Akiyama of the candidate independents, and incomprehensibleness showed a lot of, the citizen net that popularity lack belonged in Yamaguchi for the member of a city council era turned around for recommendation of Ueda, and support did not open. I received a blast of the candidate flooding, and Sato of the Communist Party recommendation was less than the vote of the party recommendation candidate in the election last time.

A faulty ballot and the total of the take-out reached approximately 48,000 votes, and it followed that nearly 30,000 votes increased in comparison with election last time. It followed that I supported that I was not able to train the candidate whom a qualified voter voted for hard till the last.

Because the Sapporo-shi board of elections received this result and notified "there is no election person" on 15th of the voting and counting the ballots day, the following day, and formal objection was not performed by 30th, I notified a schedule of the mayor re-election on May 25 on May 1 and decided June 8 with an election day [1]. Because an election day was June 8 that is the period of the temporary exception method [2] in an election date, the election will be performed in the schedule of nationwide local elections on the next time, too.

June re-election

Because I was not, the candidate who got 25% of legal votes necessary for election in the mayoral election of April was performed. 

Basic data

Among seven candidates who ran for election in April, Ueda and Nakao showed up in person again, and other five people gave up the candidacy. The LDP where I looked at the way and recommended を to supported Gaku Ishizaki of the former member of the House of Representatives who lost a general election in 2000, and the Communist Party supported Keiji Aoyama of the way committee vice chairman as a ticket in place of Sato.

  • A notification day: May 25, 2003
  • An election day: June 8, 2003
  • The number of the qualified voters: 1,473,833 people
  • The number of the candidates: Four people
List of candidates (report order)
Candidate name Age Political party The old and the new Recommendation, support political party Careers
Keiji Aoyama 48 The Communist Party New face Political party officer
Noriyuki Nakao  56 Independent New face The cause, member of the House of Councilors
Fumio Ueda  54 Independent New face
  • (recommendation) Citizen net
  • (support) The Democratic Party, the Social Democratic Party
Lawyer
Gaku Ishizaki  47 Independent New face The former member of the House of Representatives (Dai-3-ku, Hokkaido)

Electoral campaign withdrawal of the candidate of Communist Party

On May 30 during a campaign season, Communist Party Hokkaido Committee clarified the policy of the voluntary vote about election campaign cancellation and the re-election of Keiji Aoyama who ran as a party ticket in re-election [3]. The candidate of the re-election in this way became the fight by 3 candidates of Nakao and Ueda, Ishizaki virtually.

Re-election result

Ueda who came first in election in April defeated Ishizaki and Nakao and, as a result of re-election, won for the first time. A person from private citizen became the mayor from a person from conventional city hall alumnus by election of Ueda after an interval of 44 years. The turnout influenced that an election day was piled up on the last day of the good point so orchid Festival which had dark it and more than 10% were less than election in April and were the lowest ever.

  • A turnout: 57.32% of turnouts of 46.38% (turnout 683,559) of April election
Election return
The results of an election Candidate Political party The old and the new The number of votes Vote rate Recommendation, support political party
Election  Fumio Ueda Independent New face 282,170 41.67%
  • (recommendation) Citizen net
  • (support) The Democratic Party, the Social Democratic Party
Gaku Ishizaki Independent New face 256,173 37.83%
  • (recommendation) LDP, New Conservative Party
  • (support) The New Komeito
Noriyuki Nakao Independent New face 126,488 18.68%
Keiji Aoyama The Communist Party New face 12,315 1.82%
Effective vote 677,146
Faulty ballot 6,381
Total votes 683,527
The source: "A Mayor of June 8, 2003 execution Sapporo re-election vote decision (all the cities)," it is Sapporo-shi board of elections Mayor of execution Sapporo re-election election return (all the cities) on June 8, 2003. November 19, 2011 reading.

As for elected Ueda, the citizens movement group including the non profit organization (NPO) presented a grass-roots movement in addition to the support from the labor union, and it worked I saw the way which ran for unaffiliated voters on LDP recommendation in election by having opened support, the election most end game in April, and to have got the support of the candidate ら 3. On the other hand, Ishizaki was strong in the repulsion for having replaced a candidate forcibly although I planned organization hardening including the support of Soka Gakkai which was a power base of the LDP and the New Komeito, and support did not open to unaffiliated voters. Most of the candidate independents who ran last time turned around for Ueda support, and Nakao who raised independents, and ran again lacked in an expanse for support [4].

When the political party support by the exit polls that Hokkaido Shimbun Press performed was different and saw it, Ueda canceled the 50% neighborhood of unaffiliated voters, a little under 80%, election campaign of the democracy substrate and acquired independence vote and higher than 40% of the Communist Party substrate that it was. On the other hand, Ishizaki got nearly 75% of the LDP substrate, more than 85% of the fair substrate, but remained in around 24% in the unaffiliated voters. The support of Nakao in unaffiliated voters remained in around 26% [5].

Footnote

  1. One ^ "election for re-election, next month 8 Sapporo mayor" Hokkaido Shimbun May 1 date evening paper, compact edition 35 pages
  2. The ^ original expression name "the temporariness such as election dates of the member of the assembly of the local public entity and the head law about the exception." The chief election that can carry out election by nationwide local elections in the law provides, "I reach the expiration in the term of office from March 1 to June 10".
  3. Of ^ "Mayor of Sapporo re-election Aoyama election campaign cancellation Communist Party, voluntary vote one policy" Hokkaido Shimbun May 30, 2003 evening paper, compact edition 1,391 pages
  4. It is 419 pages of compact editions for "the Mayor of Sapporo ^ on one date on Ueda" Hokkaido Shimbun June 9, 2003
  5. On ^ Hokkaido Shimbun June 9, 2003 date three when "unaffiliated voters win a friend" "decisive battle", it is 421 pages of compact editions

References

Allied item

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia The 2003 Sapporo mayoral election

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기