2016년 12월 31일 토요일

The deliberation (horse racing)

The deliberation (horse racing)

I point to examination and the thing checking whether there was not an act unjust between before reaching the finish line after the gate of the starting gate opened in a certain race with the deliberation (the use of deliberation is seen with しんぎ, British :Stewards' Inquiry, or merely inquiry) in the horse racing.

I speak the deliberation of the Japanese horse racing of Japan mainly as follows.

Table of contents

Summary

Doubt of the course interference produces the deliberation during a race and is performed when a problem occurs in the weight.

in Japan

Japanese horse racing

The deliberation of the Japanese horse racing is carried out as grounds with 2 [1] of Japanese central race meeting horse racing enforcement official regulations Chapter 8 Article 121.

Until 2012, I displayed it on an electric signboard with [2] to tell about a decision clerk (I act with a decision committee and join a gondola decision room and a metage decision room) discussing it by all means when I discussed it by broadcast in a racetrack (it is said with deliberation broadcast). In (in the local horse race track from April), the deliberation indication of a blue lamp and the electric signboard indicating the deliberation does not turn on from January, 2013 except when there is possibility of accretion, the disqualification in within fifth place arrival horse [3].

When the deliberation is carried out about within fifth place arrival horse, I display "審" which is abbreviation of "the deliberation" or the deliberation on the electric signboard. In addition, with the racetrack letting turn on the blue lamp (mainly Japanese horse racing). It is usually shown just after the race end that this deliberation is carried out, but may be shown after the race including the case that had a problem with weight by a weigh-in being over, and doing it for a while. The arrival order of the horse thought to be the doing damage to horse was within fifth place, and, after 2013, it might be shown in the electric signboard to discuss while big [4] to be informed of after it wore it, and it was confirmed that there was not a difference (in other words, the order of arrival change is possible) raced between a damage horse besides until 2012.

After a race, I discuss it whether a decision committee watches a patrol video, and the race horse becomes a target of accretion, the disqualification [note 1]. I call the person concerned of horse both sides targeted for in the case of Japanese horse racing of Japan and sometimes a damage horse, the deliberation in a decision room and may listen to circumstances.

When the deliberation is informed of it in the hall, deliberation broadcast is performed regardless of having accretion, disqualification or not in the same way again by a decision clerk, and, after the deliberation, a result of the deliberation is announced in the hall.

 
The turf vision which informs what I am discussing

It may be announced by hall broadcast basically because a change of the order of arrival occurs depending on a result of the deliberation without the order of arrival being established until the end of the deliberation saying "I ask for the your other betting ticket not to throw it away". In addition, it follows it and may discuss only a high rank arrival horse that the deliberation is prolonged and performs the refund of the betting ticket immediately when there is not influence to a higher arrival horse after having been settled.

When injustice and a foul are accepted as a result of deliberation, the sanctions for the jockey are decided after an order of arrival decision. It is distinguished a man and horse together by some including the thing with the cause that there is a main cause for a horse for sanctions and decides the contents of sanctions by the contents of the foul by a decision committee.

In the Japanese horse racing, an arrival at difference of the within fifth place arrival horse is successively displayed with or without the deliberation after a race by an electric signboard (order of arrival bulletin board), but I wear it after a decision, and the difference is not displayed by an electric signboard when the within fifth place arrival horse has accretion, disqualification and is settled [note 2]. But I am displayed with formal publication of JRA and will) that became the accretion after having introduced it in "○ rank accretion "(=○ rank on the website.

The distrust of decision committee and right or wrong of the reform

In Japanese horse racing, the decision committee discussing is the staff of JRA without the all the members experience. This one fact is discussed by various sides, and I am a trigger of "the distrust of decision", or the grounds include it.

The present conditions that decision is carried out are often filliped in each place by "a nonspecialist" without the race riding on horseback experience. However, I have it pointed out so that it is said that you should appoint a person who experienced merely jockey as a decision committee even if it is not a simple problem. This is one of the big evils of the inner stable system, and, according to horse racing site "サラブネット which Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. runs," it is said that I am due to jockey aspect each other and an animal trainer, the human relations of the stable person concerned being too heavy. Most animal trainers are the people whom I turned into from a jockey, and, as for the jockey, most are having learned under the same teacher of the horse racing school. I state that the bond as a senior, a younger student, the same period of the horse racing school or various human relations formed in jockey life, stable life bring about physical education society-like "vertical relations". Furthermore, I conclude it after raising that free-lance jockeys employing the same riding on horseback request intermediary (agent) are often called "line", and having pointed out that the increase of the free jockey who in late years became remarkable did not rarefy human relations saying "the appointment to the decision committee of the jockey experienced person whom some debaters insist on in such soil is difficult". In addition, touch that there are many amateur decision committees like "a local celebrity", and it is shown in the origin of Yukio Okabe jockey who became a decision committee (committee making final decision for the protest to decision) as JRA adviser having shown a negative thought to decision participation saying "I am seen with sunglasses" and the Europe horse racing that the decision by the person without the riding on horseback experience does not necessarily become the root of problems. [5]

In addition, it is argued about the neutrality of the decision. The JRA side takes some solutions about this, too. Specifically, I decided to add three outside committees (the person whom the JRA chief director entrusted from a person with the specialized knowledge and experience about the race of the horse racing) to the decision committee with the thing which so far was comprised only of the staff of the JRA legal affairs region (post unlike Department of Appeal where a decision committee belongs to) about the tribunal which was a trial engine for the last time for the protest to the decision that a decision committee gave from 2009. Some improvement was in this way seen. Hideaki Miyuki who has performed protest to decision for a decision committee gives an affirmative evaluation saying "I came to hear a story more, and a judge does it definitely in most cases". However, it is unchanged that a tribunal is a set texture of JRA although three outside committees increased and is far from the externalization (cutting apart from JRA) of the decision process that people for the perfection neutrality of the decision insist on. [6]Above-mentioned サラブネット demands the cause that externalization does not advance to from the heavy human relations between people concerned with horse racing again. For example, touch that in the first place horse racing school itself to train a jockey of the Japanese horse racing is one organization of JRA and do the externalization of the decision engine since there is the strong unity of the person concerned with horse racing if it is difficult. [5]

The prospective solution is security of the transparency of the deliberation while reform such as the statement above is difficult if I can perform it immediately, and an immediate effect is high. I show the deliberation becoming closed and a process of the decision, and it is required in a part now that I accept the hearing of the third party. Without quality of decision in itself rising, I am in this way said to be it when I can regain the trust from the fan who fell into the ground. [6]

Local horse race track

Overseas in Japan

In horse racing out of Japan, so-called "overseas horse racing," there is the part which is different from Japan in circumstances.

In Europe, it is generally limited that the deliberation is carried out when a damage horse affects acquisition of the prize money. For example, in the case of the general race that the prize money is paid to only to the horse to three, a damage horse becomes the condition that what a damage horse introduces within the sixth place in the case of the high-winnings prize race that the prize money is paid to to within fourth place, the horse to five discusses, and the race is just settled even if there is how terrible run interference as for other case. [7][8] because the order of arrival itself of a doing damage to horse, the damage horse is unrelated to the accretion in Japan, for example, the example such as a 15th place arrival horse becoming the accretion to 18 is possible, but there is not such a thing in Europe. But it is the same as Japan that run interference is not permitted because a damage horse is low-ranking and introduced it because it is discussed after a race decision about the sanctions to a jockey by all means when a horse concerned will be a lower arrival horse. [8]

In addition, the deliberation is carried out by the claim of a jockey or the animal trainer globally in most cases. [7]There is a system called "statement [note 3] [9] of the run interference" based on Japanese central race meeting horse racing enforcement official regulations Article 127, and Japanese horse racing of Japan can have I make a statement, and the decision committee discuss the owner of a racehorse of the damage horse or an animal trainer or a jockey, but a decision committee is really own judgment, and there are predominantly more cases beginning the deliberation, and the run interference statement remains in a thing exceptional virtually. In addition, in Japan, I state the most of the deliberation that began by a run interference statement and am often over for rejection. Here is a big difference with Japan and other country, too.

About the deliberation indication, it is near that of Japanese horse racing after 2013 of Japan. When the order of arrival of the higher arrival horse may change in Europe, indication of the deliberation is given. In addition, according to the said article, indication of the deliberation often appears in the deliberation of the horse racing of each country suddenly to be performed by the demand of the damage horse side mainly after a race being finished, and passing for a while. [7]

Deliberation broadcast

I announce the results of a thing and the deliberation discussing using hall broadcast. I call this announcement deliberation broadcast. By the deliberation broadcast, I announce a point (just after running, in the case of 第 ○ corner, the grand tier, the last stretch, finish line this side ,○ 周目第 ○ show jumping, run in ○○ from ,○○ after running without an interval) that occurred, a horse name considered to have been damaged, an item (a course having become small, having tripped, having lost the balance, a jockey having fallen from the horse, having fallen down, having canceled a race, having sulked outward) which occurred. But the case thought that two of them touched it says with "○○ and an X X having touched it and announces it with "the event at the 第 ○ corner" without raising horse name when an item does not become clear.

I give below content of the deliberation broadcast in the Japanese horse racing. In addition, all the horse names are aerial horse names.

Enforcement of the deliberation

".○○ 競馬第 ○ race telling you about discusses it; it is the explanation of the deliberation object item within the fifth place following ...". Finally it is announced saying "the vote ticket you have, please be careful not to throw it away until a decision because the horse which I introduced in the high rank is an object of the deliberation.".

Example of the announcement of the item targeted for the deliberation within the fifth place

  • On "finish line this side, I discuss it about a course of the eleventh Wikipedia having become small."
  • "I discuss it about the eleventh Wikipedia having tripped after running without an interval."
  • "I discuss it about a jockey of the eleventh Wikipedia having lost the balance in the last stretch."
  • "I discuss it about a jockey of the eleventh Wikipedia having fallen from its horse in the grand tier."
  • "I discuss it about the eleventh Wikipedia having turned over in the last stretch."
  • "I discuss it about the eleventh Wikipedia having canceled a race at the fourth corner."
  • "I discuss it about the eleventh Wikipedia having bulged outward at the first corner."
  • "I discuss it about what the seventh ウィクショナリー and the eleventh Wikipedia contacted at the second lap third corner."
  • "I discuss it about the event at the third corner."
  • In "the last stretch, I put it together about the eleventh course having become small and the seventh course having become small and discuss it."
  • "A race is in the latter half and discusses it about the eleventh course having become small." (only in the case of Niigata straight line 1,000m)

Less than 6 case

".○○ 競馬第 ○ race telling you about becomes the explanation of less than 6 deliberationless items following ...". Finally it is announced saying "I televise a patrol video about this matter later.".

Example of the announcement of the item which there is no lower than sixth place deliberation in

  • On "finish line this side, there was the phenomenon that a course of the eleventh Wikipedia became small."
  • "There was the phenomenon that the eleventh Wikipedia failed in after running without an interval."
  • "There was the phenomenon that a jockey of the eleventh Wikipedia lost the balance in the last stretch."
  • "There was the phenomenon that a jockey of the eleventh Wikipedia fell from its horse in the grand tier."
  • "There was the phenomenon that the eleventh Wikipedia turned over in the last stretch."
  • "There was the phenomenon that the eleventh Wikipedia canceled a race at the fourth corner."
  • "There was the phenomenon that the eleventh Wikipedia bulged outward at the first corner."
  • "There was the phenomenon that the seventh ウィクショナリー and the eleventh Wikipedia contacted at the second lap third corner."
  • "There was the event at the third corner."
  • In "the last stretch, there was the phenomenon that the eleventh course became small, and there was the phenomenon that the seventh course became small."
  • "A race was in the latter half, and there was the phenomenon that the eleventh course became small." (only in the case of Niigata straight line 1,000m)

In the case of 4.5 rank, I it

It is announced saying ".○○ 競馬第 ○ race telling you about discusses it sequentially, but is settled according to the arrival order to the third place.". In this case it is not a decision for a race, but the betting ticket becomes the decision, and an announcement of the refund is carried out later. In addition, after the deliberation, the result is announced with or without accretion, disqualification.

Deliberation end (when accretion, disqualification does not occur)

".○○ 競馬第 ○ race that kept waiting discussed it, but is settled according to the arrival order; a deliberation result is still announced following ...".

Example of the announcement of the deliberation result

  • "The horse targeted for the deliberation was the seventh, and, in the last stretch, the eleventh course became small."
  • 「最後の直線コースで、11番は充分な進路が取れなかったため控えたものであり、進路が狭くなったものでありました。」
  • 「7番は左側に寄れたことにより、最後の直線コースで、11番の進路が狭くなったものでありました。」
  • 「この件は7番が内側に動いたことにより、最後の直線コースで、11番の進路が狭くなったものでありました。」
  • 「最後の直線コースで、11番はバテ下がった前の馬をかわすため、控えたものでありました。」
  • 「11番は他の馬に関係なく、つまずいて騎手が落馬し、最後の直線コースで、競走を中止したものでありました。」
  • 「11番は他の馬に関係なく、最後の直線コースで、外側にふくれたものでありました。」
  • 「審議の対象馬は先の件は3番で最後の直線コースで、11番の進路が狭くなったものであり、後の件は5番で同じく最後の直線コースで7番の進路が狭くなったものでありました。」

審議終了（降着・失格が生じた場合）

「お待たせ致しました。○○競馬第○レースの審議についてお知らせ致します。」に続いて審議結果がアナウンスされる。冒頭部のアナウンスが降着・失格が生じない場合と異なる。

Example of the announcement of the deliberation result

  • 「第3位に入線した、7番ウィクショナリー号は、最後の直線コースで急に内側に斜行し、11番ウィキペディア号の走行を妨害したため、第9着に降着とし、着順を変更の上、確定致します。従って、3着までの着順は、1着4番、2着8番、3着1番となります。」
  • 「第3位に入線した、7番ウィクショナリー号は、2周目6号障害で急に内側に斜飛し、11番ウィキペディア号の走行を妨害したため、第9着に降着とし、着順を変更の上、確定致します。従って、3着までの着順は、1着4番、2着8番、3着1番となります。」
  • 「第3位に入線した、3番ウィキニュース号は、最後の直線コースで急に内側に斜行し、11番ウィキペディア号の走行を妨害したため、第9着に降着とし、着順を変更の上、確定致します。従って、3着までの着順は、1着4番、2着8番、3着1番となります。なお、最後の直線走路で、7番の進路が狭くなったことについて審議をいたしましたが、この件による失格馬、及び降着馬はございません。なお、この件の対象馬は、5番でした。」
  • 「第3位に入線した、7番ウィクショナリー号は、最後の直線コースで急に外側に斜行し、11番ウィキペディア号の走行を妨害したため、失格とし、着順を変更の上、確定致します。従って、3着までの着順は、1着4番、2着8番、3着1番となります。」
  • 「第3位に入線した、7番ウィクショナリー号は、2周目6号障害で急に外側に斜飛し、11番ウィキペディア号の走行を妨害したため、失格とし、着順を変更の上、確定致します。従って、3着までの着順は、1着4番、2着8番、3着1番となります。」

審議終了（被害馬が先着していた場合）

".○○ 競馬第 ○ race that kept waiting discussed it, but is settled according to the arrival order; a deliberation result is still announced following ...".

Example of the announcement of the deliberation result

  • 「7番ウィクショナリー号は、最後の直線コースで、11番ウィキペディア号の走行を妨害しましたが、被害馬が先着のため、着順の変更はありません。」

中央競馬の「不服申立て制度」

中央競馬では1994年以降、審議の結果裁決委員が下した裁決に不服のある当事者（馬主、騎手、調教師）は裁決委員以外の上部機関[注 4]にアピール（不服申し立て）することができる（アピール制度）[11]。アピールには所定の保証金（2011年時点では原則10万円[12]、ただし走行妨害申し立ての棄却の裁決に対するアピールに関しては7万円[注 5]）を支払うことが必要。[注 6]2011年2月までに行われた申し立てはすべて棄却されている[13]。

注釈

  1. ^ 中央競馬では1990年末、地方競馬では1991年3月までは進路妨害にあたる行為は被害馬が競走中止にならなくても、加害馬は一律失格となっていた
  2. ^ これは降着制度が始まった1991年から変わっていない
  3. ^ 日本中央競馬会競馬施行規程第8章第127条[1]
  4. ^ 当初は日本中央競馬会の役職員のみで構成されていたが、2009年6月20日から外部委員がメンバーに加わった[10]。
  5. ^ 競馬施行規程第10章第150条[1]
  6. ^ 競馬施行規程第10章第150条、第151条、第154条、第155条[1]

脚注

  1. ^ a b c d 日本中央競馬会競馬施行規程 - JRA公式サイト、2013年1月30日閲覧
  2. ^ 走行妨害および制裁について - JRA公式サイト。ページ下部のビデオ「競馬メカニズム ～審議編～」を参照。なお、これと同じ動画はYouTube上にも非公式にアップされている。
  3. ^ 2013年1月から降着・失格のルールが変わります - JRA公式サイト
  4. ^ 【甘辛戦記】降着めぐる「新ルール」で大トラブル - ZAKZAK、2013年1月22日閲覧
  5. ^ a b デイリー NIKKEI サラブネット(08/6/2) - サラブネット、2013年1月29日閲覧
  6. ^ a b 「透明な」JRA裁決を！ファン9割望む - 日刊スポーツ、2013年2月4日閲覧
  7. ^ a b c 大西貴久調教助手のブログ 2010年10月4日
  8. ^ a b 大西貴久調教助手のブログ 2010年10月5日
  9. ^ 中央競馬Q&A 第14版 平成24年 - JRA公式サイト。20ページ「Q43．走行妨害の申立てとは。」を参照
  10. ^ 谷川善久 (2009年6月14日). "中央競馬ニュース「不服審理委員会に外部委員が参加」" (日本語). Racing Topics. 日本中央競馬会. 2011年3月8日閲覧。
  11. ^ "中央競馬Q&A 第12版 (PDF)" (日本語). 日本中央競馬会. pp. 20 (2010年). 2011年3月8日閲覧。「Q43.不服申立て（アピール）制度とは。」参照
  12. ^ "幸 英明騎手からの不服申立てについて" (日本語). 日本中央競馬会 (2011年2月28日). 2011年3月8日閲覧。
  13. ^ "幸の申し立て棄却" (日本語). スポーツ報知 (2011年3月3日). 2011年3月8日閲覧。

参考資料・出典

「https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=審議_(競馬)&oldid=52586096」から取得

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia The deliberation (horse racing)

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기

피드 구독하기: 댓글 (Atom)