2016년 7월 25일 월요일

Credit Suisse securities group report leak case

Credit Suisse securities group report leak case

Credit Suisse securities group report leak case (I carry Credit Suisse) is the case that the employee (including the retired employee) of Credit Suisse securities is a group, and became the omission of report of the national tax.

Table of contents

Summary

In November, 2008, National Tax Agency performed the simultaneous tax inquiry of the employee of Credit Suisse securities and the retired employee. The target person amounted to approximately 300, but it was a report leak without tax practice reporting the foreign countries salary that almost none of of 300 received for a company's stock (stocks with buying and selling limit article and stock option) definitely, and approximately 100 were no reports for they stocks reward soon. The same period later, an investigation enters other foreign-affiliated securities, and an omission of large number of reports is pointed out in the same way [1].

National Tax Agency Intelligence Department raided it about Director one cause foreign country bond region (I already retire) Takashi Hatta (I let you swat it) in approximately 100 which was no report in the tax inquiry for the Credit Suisse securities employee in December, 2008, but completely denied Hatta about the intention of the tax evasion from the beginning of tax inquiry [2].

I make modifications in planned tax payment, October, 2009 in May, 2009, and Hatta declares.

It is reported by a raid that National Tax Agency pressed criminal charges against Hatta by income tax law alleged violation in February, 2010 when passed through one year or more [4]; [5]. As for what faced criminal charges only in Swiss securities among approximately 100 and done stocks reward nothing filers on several hundred people, a clay day, he was only alone in those days throughout the trade.

Heavy additional tax (disguise, the concealment that the requirements are vicious) was performed a levy of, and Hatta did formal objection as dissatisfaction in the Meguro-ku taxation office which was a tax payment place in June, 2010 though I paid it once.

The investigation by the prosecution special investigation department started from the accusation news in September, 2011 after the interregnum of one and a half years. And, as for the investigation by the special investigation department, Hatta is indicted without arrest afterwards for three months [6]; [7]. I arrest you for the denial case approximately surely and, in a criminal case, am detained, but, in Hatta, was not detained an arrest in spite of a complete denial in this case "miraculously".

Hatta performed "relay from the spot" of the investigation of the prosecution special investigation department on Twitter [3]; [8]. Hatta sends information with a note with a hashtag of "# prosecution なう" as Twitter of the oneself account and appeals to other Twitter users for the use of the hashtag [9].

Trial begins in February, 2012.

In March, 2012, "a meeting to support" starts on Facebook in Hatta [10].

As for the trial of Hatta, it became annual an observer attached a hashtag of "# prosecution なう", and to tweet to call it a Hatta "participation type event" (there is a link of トゥギャッター which summarized a tweet in a plug in "link" in the Hatta blog of the following "outside link").

The Takasugi jujube of the comic artist draws a design of the trial on the comic (there is a link in a URL in a plug in "rink" in the Hatta blog of the following "outside link").

Hatta was invited as a guest three times in 5/24/2012 (during first trial trial), 7/25/2013 (after a first trial acquittal) and 2/26/2014 (after an innocence decision) and "the meeting which straightened the Japanese judiciary" [11]. An interviewer, progress: Osamu Aoki (journalist), a panelist: Masakuni Murakami (former member of the House of Councilors), Tadataka Hayakawa (lawyer). The design is placed as an article of 後掲 (following "article others" reference) on magazine "weekly publication Friday" by Osamu Aoki.

An acquittal first in March, 2013 Intelligence Department accusation, prosecution special investigation department prosecution case in a history in Japan. Prosecution appeal.

It is maintained a first trial acquittal in January, 2014 by prosecution appeal rejection. Prosecution gives up a final appeal in February and establishes innocence.

No decision is given, and Hatta demands dissatisfaction judgment from formal objection of the heavy additional tax until February, 2014. The Meguro taxation office in June, 2014 a change (after heavy additional tax → underreport additional tax and a time limit about the year of the report post-date-negligence additional tax) of the levy decision. It was thought that I extinguished profit of the dissatisfaction umpire request, but Hatta continued dissatisfaction umpire request for the reason explanation of a levy reason of the very beginning heavy additional tax and the change. In March, 2015, the dissatisfaction umpire place performs request of decision of dismissing it, but a levy reason of the heavy additional tax was not explained there either. The tax practice procedure to affect a case is in this way finished.

On May 16, 2014, "how was the first innocence born a challenge to winning rate zero a book of Hatta in history from Kobunsha?"; release [12] [13].

The fight with the investigation power of Hatta replaces offense and defense and will be fought about reparation by the state request suit. The agent team is Yoichi Kitamura, Nobuo Satohara, forest flame, lawyer four of Masakazu Komatsu. The charged amount is 500 million yen. When I win the case, Hatta announces that I assume it the fund for detective judicial reforms with compensation money. [14].

July 28, 2014 日国賠審第一回口頭弁論

Article others

On January 30, 2012, the article "truth of the Credit Suisse" "national policy investigation" by Chikaki Tanaka is placed in Nikkei Business. [15]

It is placed an article by journalist Osamu Aoki in magazine "weekly publication Friday" 912 (September 21, 2012 release) "is it that an office worker of the tax deduction evades its taxes intentionally?" [16].

On March 1, 2013, the article "thing which this 返 ろう ... acquittal means in the original intention without forgetting the original intention" by Shoko Egawa is placed in Yahoo! News. [17]

In magazine "FRIDAY" April 5, 2014 issue an article by Chikaki Tanaka "Martha came over suddenly" "is placed in the national tax the confession of the man who won [18].

"Condemnation is placed in the magazine "FACTA" April, 2013 issue a judge with "mineral tar an article by Chikaki Tanaka in the fear group where special investigation" threatens historic defeat human rights" [19].

Article "valuable judgment drilled by the fort of no error of the prosecution" by journalist Osamu Aoki is placed in magazine "weekly publication Friday" 956 (August 23, 2013 release) [20].

"The first acquittal was maintained by a national tax accusation, special investigation prosecution," but, on January 31, 2014, is placed an article by Shoko Egawa in Yahoo! News. [21]

Blog "HORIEMON.COM" February 1, 2014 printing "Credit Suisse securities cause director, the second trial an innocent stocks reward tax evasion case to rotate super false accusation case" of Takafumi Horie [22]

The article "background and problems that the acquittal authorities reached an accusation and the prosecution to an origin of Credit Suisse securities director again" by Prosecutor chief at former special investigation department Tsunehiko Maeda are placed in the "Daily Diamond" February 7, 2014 issue for "weekly diamond" Web [23].

Blog "HORIEMON.COM" February 14, 2014 printing "one what prosecution finishes experiencing in the world document to prove." of Takafumi Horie [24]

On February 15, 2014 for Yahoo! News an article of Shoko Egawa "an innocent decision but ..." is placed. [25]

In magazine "weekly publication present age" March 29, 2014 issue and "modern business" April 15, 2014 issue for Web "a turn is innocent, and scoop confession "came over to the mineral tar suddenly," but the man who beat Takashi Hatta Credit Suisse securities former director national tax is placed by the tax evasion charge of 132 million yen. [26]

"An accusation is placed in "Business Journal" (rhinoceros dzo, June 30, 2014 delivery) a victim by a national tax, the trick of the investigation, the investigation that the prosecution special investigation department, a shock of the complete defeat are terrible, and is strange" an article. [27]

In magazine "weekly publication Orient economy" February 14, 2015 issue, it is "still introduced as a historic case called "Hatta shock" among people concerned with national tax" "Credit Suisse securities group report leak case" by an article entitled "depression of the strongest investigation corps mineral tar".

"I cannot watch the power without the effort to come to be acknowledged superiority without drawing close," but am placed an article by Chikaki Tanaka who collected data on Credit Suisse securities group report leak case others in the magazine "journalism" April, 2016 issue.

First trial, appeal court trial, 国賠審口頭弁論

The first trial legal counsel was organized in Lawyer Masakazu Komatsu (the chief counsel) of the Komatsu synthesis law office [28], Lawyer Ayako Sano [30] of Suzuki, the Soga law office [29], three people of one others in total.

The trial body is Judge presiding judge Yoshiko Noguchi, 右陪席佐藤弘規裁判官, 左陪席小泉健介裁判官 in the first trial. When put it after the second trial; 裁判長佐藤弘規裁判官, 右陪席渡辺美紀子裁判官, 左陪席小泉健介裁判官.

After that the process of the trial knows a lot about category "# prosecution なう trial report" of the blog (following "outside link" reference) of Hatta updated on the same day.

The first trial begins on February 22, 2012. The tax practice handling of as the retirement bonus stocks reward paid at the time of right of prosecution abuse of the Public Prosecutor's Office and resignation was given to the claim of the defense other than innocence of Hatta.

The second trial begins on April 11, 2012. The statement of the director of department of former foreign country bond was carried out with the permission of the judge. In addition, the discovery order statement of the minutes of "the accusation necessity or not taking into consideration meeting" of this matter that hung down than a defense between Public Prosecutor's Office and National Tax Agency was carried out.

The third trial begins on June 8, 2012. The witness questioning of the general manager of legal affairs, compliance unification division of Credit Suisse securities was carried out. The taking of evidence request of the identification of first valve was carried out, too [31].　

The fourth trial begins on August 22, 2012. The taking of evidence request of the identification of additional valve was carried out. The prosecution is disagreement in most.

The fifth trial begins on September 14, 2012. The questioning of the licensed tax accountant was carried out as a defence witness.

The sixth trial begins on September 28, 2012. An examination of the accused was carried out for (for defense lawyer cross-examination three hours prosecutor cross-examination two hours) for five hours.

The seventh trial begins on October 26, 2012. An examination of the accused (defense lawyer cross-examination, prosecutor cross-examination, judge supplement questioning) was carried out for three hours 30 minutes.

The eighth trial begins on November 7, 2012. An examination of the accused (judge supplement questioning) was carried out for one hour 30 minutes.

The ninth trial begins on November 26, 2012. Prosecution final speech largely extended planned time and was performed. The closing argument is fine 40 million yen for penal servitude two years.

The tenth trial begins on December 21, 2012. A statement was carried out in closing argument, the defendant last and concluded a hearing. Hatta spoke the last statement for 20 minutes.

The eleventh trial begins on March 1, 2013. The first-ever acquittal is announced for National Tax Agency Intelligence Department accusation, a case of the prosecution special investigation department prosecution [32]; [33].

On March 12, 2013, the prosecution appeals without waiting for decision completion.

The appeal court legal counsel consists of two people of Lawyer Masakazu Komatsu and Lawyer Yoichi Kitamura [34] acting as the chief counsel sequentially.

Prosecution appeal prospectus is submitted on July 1, 2013. The legal counsel submits an appeal document stating the position of the defense on September 6, 2013.

The appeal court first trial begins on November 15, 2013. The appeal court trial body (Tokyo High Court detective Part 1) is Presiding Judge Masanori Tsunoda, Judge Toshitaka Ito, Judge Kamakura Masakazu. I reject all documentary evidence, testimony of a witness (examination of the accused) of the prosecution request and conclude a hearing in only 6 minutes.

The appeal court second trial begins on January 31, 2014. It becomes the appeal rejection and maintains an acquittal [35].

On February 14, 2014, Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office gives up a final appeal saying, "a clear final appeal reason is not found". Innocence of Hatta was settled [36]; [37].

The 国賠審第 once oral proceedings begin on July 28, 2014. 国賠審裁判体 (Tokyo District Court civil affair Part 13) is the Hitoshi Murata will presiding judge, Judge Norio Sekine, Judge Taku Takada. A statement of Lawyer Nobuo Satohara was carried out on behalf of Hatta and an agent team. [38] [39]

The 国賠審第 twice oral proceedings begin on October 20, 2014. During this time, I received defendant first preparatory documents submitted to by a country, and a statement of Hatta was carried out following the last time.

The 国賠審第 three times oral proceedings begin on December 15, 2014. The presiding judges are changed to Judge Yoshimitsu Kawai from Judge Murata and update public speaking. The plaintiff submits the first preparatory documents.

The 国賠審第 four times oral proceedings begin on March 2, 2015. During this time, I received defendant second preparatory documents submitted to by a world, and a statement of Hatta was performed three times.

The 国賠審第 five times oral proceedings begin on May 18, 2015. "Use of the evidence out of the purpose" is pointed out by the defendant, and, about plaintiff second preparatory documents, the discussion is accomplished.

The 国賠審第 six times oral proceedings begin on July 27, 2015. The discussion that how requested evidence of the prosecution collection in form not to be "the use of the evidence out of the purpose" by a criminal trial sequentially in 国賠審 was done. I submit each third preparatory documents to a plaintiff, the defendants.

The 国賠審第 seven times oral proceedings begin on September 28, 2015. The plaintiff submits fourth ... 7 preparatory documents.

The 国賠審第 eight times oral proceedings begin on December 7, 2015. The plaintiff submits the fourth preparatory documents to the defendant the eighth preparatory documents. I was going to apply for the plaintiff, and the explanation of the witness was carried out.

The 国賠審第 nine times oral proceedings begin on February 8, 2016. The plaintiff submits 第 9-10 preparatory documents. "There is no need of the argument" in the defendant. The preparatory documents about the proof purpose by the planned witness are going to be made by a date on the next time by a plaintiff.

The 国賠審第 ten times oral proceedings begin on April 4, 2016. The plaintiff submits 第 11-13 preparatory documents. Witness application was carried out. About a plaintiff claim, I demand approval or disapproval from the defendant, but it is said that there is no need in the defendant and remains silent. The Nobuo Satohara blog "八田氏国賠訴訟, country, prosecution which "an appeal is illegal", and was driven into a corner" where "Nobuo Satohara cuts it" know a lot about explanation in the progress at this stage. [40]

The 国賠審第 11 times oral proceedings are May 30, 2016 opening of a court pre-. The plaintiff submits 第 14-15 preparatory documents. The defendant does not make approval or disapproval sequentially. "The defendant wants to give some kind of approval or disapproval, claims to a judge about a point pointed out in plaintiff 14th preparatory documents as a court."

The 国賠審第 12 times oral proceedings are going to begin in a Tokyo District Court 611th court at 10:00 on August 22, 2016.

Chronological table

  • Tax inquiry simultaneous on November 5, 2008 for the staff of - Credit Suisse securities and approximately 300 former staffs.
  • It is raided in four places of real estate in the name of Hatta and five places of the parents' house of Kanazawa in total on December 16, 2008 by - National Tax Agency Intelligence Department.
  • A May, 2009 -8 field, the planned tax payment.
  • An October, 2009 -8 field, a modified report.
  • February 19, 2010 - Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau Hatta in Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office criminal charge (the thing that the accusation has been already done on December 7, 2009 a news day) [41].
  • It is formal objection for a -8 field, heavy additional tax levy in June, 2010.
  • An investigation start of Hatta by September 12, 2011 - Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office special investigation department.
  • I prosecute a -8 field for income tax law alleged violation on December 7, 2011 [6].　
  • A February 22, 2012 -8 field, the first trial.　
  • A December 21, 2012 -8 field, the trial conclusion of a hearing.
  • I announce an acquittal to - Tokyo District Court, Hatta on March 1, 2013.　
  • I reject appeal court first trial, all prosecution request evidence in - Tokyo High Court on November 15, 2013 and conclude a hearing.
  • January 31, 2014 - Tokyo High Court, appeal rejection.
  • I demand dissatisfaction judgment without waiting for a -8 field, decision for the formal objection of the heavy additional tax levy in February, 2014.
  • I give up - Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, a final appeal on February 14, 2014. Innocence of Hatta is settled.
  • - Meguro taxation office cancels heavy additional tax levy without explanation in June, 2014 and changes levy decision of it to underreport additional tax (and after a time limit in the year of the report post-date-negligence additional tax).
  • July 28, 2014 - 国賠審第一回口頭弁論

Similar case

The example accused by the Japanese tax authority is past and exists without performing a final income tax return of stocks reward (goods stock and stock option) that is not made 源泉徴取.

  • I used it, and the Johnson & Johnson K.K. Japanese subsidiary former representative acquired stock option stocks approximately 158 million yen, but income tax approximately 58 million yen was prosecuted in February, 2010 without reporting it saying that I evaded my taxes. Unlike Credit Suisse securities case, there was a disguised act such as using a foreign aerial account. Conviction is announced in June, 2010.
  • The J.P. Morgan securities Japanese subsidiary former director did not report approximately 147 million yen of the stocks reward, and income tax approximately 54 million yen was prosecuted in September, 2011 saying that I evaded my taxes (while an investigation of Hatta is prolonged). It was an example that approximately 120 employees who included a former director have a report leak of approximately 2 billion yen in total pointed out by the tax authority and resemble Credit Suisse securities case in, but, as for the origin of J.P. Morgan securities director, conviction is announced to child maintenance in December, 2011 by the stringency of economic circumstances without becoming the issue about the intention characteristics because I recognized a crime when unavoidable.

References

  • "How was the first innocence born a challenge to winning rate zero Takashi Hatta in history?"; Kobunsha, 2014. ISBN 9784334977849. 
  • Takahiko Soejima "celebrities Kobunsha bullied by a tax bureaucrat", 2014. ISBN 9784334977702. 
  • Chikaki Tanaka "do not permit great evil; is case book Kodansha, 2016 of the national tax reporter". ISBN 4062816423. 
  • Chikaki Tanaka "a national tax reporter is world Kodansha, 2011 of the authentic record mineral tar". ISBN 9784062174367. 
  • Nobuo Satohara "justice Tsukama bookshop of the accusation", 2015. ISBN 4480068473. 
  • "Justly standard ("land tax suit <No. 8 over the authorization of the violation of income tax law innocence case - ほ de-の intention to depend on Masakazu Komatsu Credit Suisse securities former director> It is collecting) finance and economy detailed report company, 2015 in land tax fairness standard (2). ISBN 4881774115. 

Outside link

Footnote

  1. It is J.P. Morgan security that a company name was reported concretely ^. "The J.P. Morgan securities employee report leak company's stock purchase right 120" that an omission of report of approximately 120 people was reported with the J.P. Morgan securities. (February 13, 2011). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201102/CN2011021201000490.html 
  2. ^ Hatta completely denied which "I did not think that there was the salary of the company which was convinced that the income tax was withheld since the stocks reward was a salary from the companies, and was not listed in a withholding slip" saying, "it could not be said that the thing which did not do it even if it was a stay of execution surely and I was arrested if I denied it and was detained for a long term if I admitted did it". National Tax Agency admits, "there is no evidence" (I prove intention of the direct tax evasion) in an investigation.
  3. ^ a b c I report "" prosecution なう investigation quickly at Twitter…In "the clever plan" of the cause foreign-affiliated securities man the special investigation department insect or worm which likely tastes bitter ". Sankei. (December 10, 2011). http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/news/111210/crm11121012010003-n1.htm 
  4. The amount of money of the omission of ^ report is Japanese Yen conversion; approximately 350 million yen (as for approximately 300 million yen of those goods stock, remainder approximately 50 million yen stock option [3]). The amount of underreport approximately 130 million yen [3]. It is revelation that National Tax Agency was thought that there were the most claim するほ de-frames whether I accuse it, and one why was prosecuted, but there was really a large amount of person who reports it, and leaked it to Credit Suisse securities. Because they accepted intention, it is thought that it is the sanction for what I denied.
  5. In ^ Hatta, it is reported the true name in newspaper and TV. The article was translated into English by Kyodo News Enterprise and was delivered to the whole world. France, each German overseas country media report the case, too.
  6. ^ a b "A foreign-affiliated former director tax evasion house arrest 130 million yen". Combination. (December 7, 2011). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201112/CN2011120701001826.html 
  7. On the occasion of ^ investigation, Hatta requires a lie detector test. The defense lawyer requires it in a document, too. However, the prosecution refused for a defense lawyer of Hatta for a reason, "there was not a machine".
  8. トゥギャッター http://togetter.com/li/267726 where I summarized the tweet at the time of the prosecution investigation of ^ Hatta in
  9. ^ Twitter "# prosecution なう" https://twitter.com/#!/search/realtime/%23%E6%A4%9C%E5%AF%9F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%86
  10. After ^ innocence decision "meeting and the changing of a name, the popular name "# prosecution なう Facebook community" which support contradiction of the # prosecution なう detective judiciary, Takashi Hatta and all people fighting against a false accusation." Link https://www.facebook.com/kensatsunow
  11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbI8IlVYvIY&feature=youtu.be for ^ 45th "meeting animation digest straightening the Japanese judiciary"
  12. "How was the first innocence born a challenge to winning rate zero in history ^ Amazon?"; http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4334977847
  13. ^ http://horiemon.com/recommend/9968/
  14. ^ 郷原信郎ブログ「郷原信郎が斬る」『八田隆氏が国家賠償請求訴訟で挑む検察への「倍返し」』　http://nobuogohara.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/%E5%85%AB%E7%94%B0%E9%9A%86%E6%B0%8F%E3%81%8C%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E8%B3%A0%E5%84%9F%E8%AB%8B%E6%B1%82%E8%A8%B4%E8%A8%9F%E3%81%A7%E6%8C%91%E3%82%80%E3%80%8C%E6%A4%9C%E5%AF%9F%E3%81%B8%E3%81%AE%E3%80%8E/
  15. ^ 『日経ビジネス』「クレディ・スイス「国策捜査」の真実」http://business.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/topics/20120125/226518/?rt=nocnt
  16. ^ 雑誌『週刊金曜日』912号　http://www.kinyobi.co.jp/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/120921-003trim.pdf
  17. ^ http://bylines.news.yahoo.co.jp/egawashoko/20130301-00023691/
  18. ^ 『FRIDAY』2014年4月5日号記事「国税に勝った男の告白「マルサは突然やってきた」」　http://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/-/35287
  19. ^ 『FACTA』 2013年4月号記事「「マルサと特捜」が歴史的敗北　人権を脅かす恐怖集団を裁判官が断罪」　https://facta.co.jp/article/201304037.html
  20. ^ 雑誌『週刊金曜日』956号　http://www.kinyobi.co.jp/news/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/130823-003trim.pdf
  21. ^ http://bylines.news.yahoo.co.jp/egawashoko/20140131-00032199/
  22. ^ http://horiemon.com/2708/
  23. ^ 前田恒彦の記事『Daily Diamond』2014年2月7日号「クレディ・スイス証券元部長に再び無罪判決　当局が告発や起訴に至った背景とその問題点」 http://dw.diamond.ne.jp/articles/-/8511
  24. ^ http://horiemon.com/3718/
  25. ^ http://bylines.news.yahoo.co.jp/egawashoko/20140215-00032670/
  26. ^ http://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/-/38750
  27. ^ http://biz-journal.jp/2014/06/post_5260.html　
  28. ^ 小松綜合法律事務所ホームページ　http://www.kplaw.jp/about/
  29. ^ 鈴木・曽我法律事務所ホームページ　http://www.tn-law.jp/attorney/index.html
  30. ^ 元ゴールドマン・サックス証券会社経済調査担当
  31. ^ 弁護側証拠調べ請求では、クレディ・スイス証券コンプライアンス部長も「株式報酬は源泉徴収されている」という認識により過少申告であったこと、ドイツ証券でも多数の申告漏れが摘発されその後源泉徴収に切り替えたこと、ゴールドマン・サックス証券では以前から株式報酬も源泉徴収していたこと、という重要な内容の検察作成検面調書、国税局作成質問顛末書が請求され、検察同意を得た。
  32. ^ "外資系元部長に無罪、東京地裁　「被告の主張排斥できず」". 共同通信. (2013年3月1日). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201303/CN2013030101001663.html 2014年1月31日閲覧。 
  33. ^ 国税局査察部が告発し、地検特捜部が起訴をした事案で無罪判決が出されるのは極めて異例。https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2neiY3m6yyLb0Vfb3NhWmpRVXc/edit?usp=sharing
  34. ^ ミネルバ法律事務所（「ミネルヴァ法律事務所」とは別）。過去の取り扱い事件には、レペタ事件、ロス疑惑事件、薬害エイズ事件、東京女子医大事件、一連の小沢一郎の事件がある。
  35. ^ "証券会社元部長、二審も無罪　株式報酬の脱税、東京高裁". 共同通信. (2014年1月31日). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201401/CN2014013101001667.html 2014年1月31日閲覧。 
  36. ^ "外資系元部長の無罪確定　ストックオプション脱税". 日本経済新聞. (2014年2月14日). http://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXNASDG1403G_U4A210C1CC1000/ 2014年2月19日閲覧。 
  37. ^ "外資系証券元部長の無罪確定　東京高検が上告断念". 共同通信. (2014年2月14日). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201402/CN2014021401002210.html 2014年2月19日閲覧。 
  38. ^ 郷原信郎ブログ『郷原信郎が斬る』「八田隆氏の対検察国賠訴訟の意義」http://nobuogohara.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/%E5%85%AB%E7%94%B0%E6%B0%8F%E3%81%AE%E5%AF%BE%E6%A4%9C%E5%AF%9F%E5%9B%BD%E8%B3%A0%E8%A8%B4%E8%A8%9F%E3%81%AE%E6%84%8F%E7%BE%A9/
  39. ^ 弁護士ドットコム記事『「捜査当局は引き返す勇気を欠いていた」 無罪になった元証券会社部長、国を訴える』　http://www.bengo4.com/topics/1845/　
  40. ^ 郷原信郎ブログ『郷原信郎が斬る』「八田氏国賠訴訟、「控訴違法」で窮地に追い込まれた国・検察」https://nobuogohara.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/%E5%85%AB%E7%94%B0%E6%B0%8F%E5%9B%BD%E8%B3%A0%E8%A8%B4%E8%A8%9F%E3%80%81%E3%80%8C%E6%8E%A7%E8%A8%B4%E9%81%95%E6%B3%95%E3%80%8D%E3%81%A7%E7%AA%AE%E5%9C%B0%E3%81%AB%E8%BF%BD%E3%81%84%E8%BE%BC%E3%81%BE/
  41. ^ "脱税容疑で外資系元部長を告発　親会社株売却、1億3千万円". Combination. (2010年2月19日). http://www.47news.jp/CN/201002/CN2010021901000398.html 
「https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=クレディ・スイス証券集団申告漏れ事件&oldid=60410299」から取得

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Credit Suisse securities group report leak case

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기

피드 구독하기: 댓글 (Atom)