2016년 10월 29일 토요일

False medical care

False medical care

The false medical care (result Ryo, English: Quackery, Health fraud) is "the quack therapy" that a quack doctor gives; [1]. There is the expression called "quackery", too [1].

In addition, a doctor giving such a medical care is called "a quack doctor" (quack doctor) from old days and is often called by the name now. The above all vicious person may be called "a corrupt doctor", and the doctor repeating trickery medical care may be called "a repeater doctor" recently [2].

Table of contents

Definition

The Oxford dictionary (The Oxford Dictionary) places a definition sentence "a person who pretends to have medical skill or knowledge" (person to pretend to be as if there is it although there are not skill and knowledge of the medicine) about quack (English quack may be translated as a quack doctor, a poor doctor, a false doctor).

An evaluation tends to be divided whether the treatment is really effective in a certain act in the viewpoint of the person receiving medical care basically whether there is not it whether it is false medical care whether it is genuine medical care.

The group where oneself is almost vested in gives honest medical care in the viewpoint of medical personnel, and it tends to be in an opinion to perform the medical care that other groups are suspicious or quack medical care [3].

Distinction of it "is not received / where payment of the health insurance is received" is a different problem with drawing the line by "false medical care" and "genuine medical care" [4].

In addition, refer to medical care (normal medical care, alternative medicine, unification medical care) because the act with some kind of curative effect is not false medical care.

A doctor and false medical

A doctor may perform an act to hurt its act and patient without curative effect (even if I seem to be medical care from a patient). The treatment in defiance of a nonsense treatment act and hope and the intention of an act and the patient that I am harmful to may be done with false medical care for a patient.

The doctor may cover the inconvenient fact while knowing that a certain act (medication, operation) does not have curative effect or while knowing that I give harm to a patient.

The reason why false medical care prevails, background

Martin Gardner gave two for the reason why false medical care prevailed in book "In the Name of Science" of 1952.

  • "Is first because a faker can usually gain money very much" [5] (in other words, say that eyes are blinded by greed for money, and a doctor gives quack medical care)
  • "The second because originally most of even a faker succeeding in "treatment" are certain" [5]

Gardner divided the reason that I secondly gave into two more and explained it. They stated, "even a quack doctor is from which became extinct even if most of the half human disease of the reason to succeed in treatment did not add any treatment including some heavy diseases" (cured spontaneously =), and half of the remainder of the reason stated, "even the thing that a therapeutic method was strange if a patient trusted a doctor because hardly psychosomatic medicine-like of the human disease contributes to the fact that the patient often healed like a miracle" [6].

In addition, it might cause the inappropriate medical act because there is the person believing a medical myth (story groundless at all medically) in a doctor according to Carol (Author, Vreeman, and Carroll 2007) with a bully man [7]. I refer to "illegal act # medicine study and the illegal act in the science" for the bogus opinion without grounds believed among doctors.

"Commercialism," "multiple drug large quantities prescription" and "illegal act # medicine study and the illegal act in the science are referred to "useless medical care", too"

Bogus medical specific example

 
Patients did not notice, but the modern medicine pointed out the Robert Mendel loss of the doctor when there was totally an aspect such as the religion [8]; [9]. That the patient only looked at the white robe and believes a person wearing just just white robe unconsciously [8]. When a believer of the religion totally makes a person wearing a canonical robe in religion facilities eyes; is [8]. Because the modern people admire science more or less though I never know it even if I actually wear a white robe what kind of personality it is, and possibility that it is a terrible fraud is enough, there is a preconception and just just believes a person wearing a white robe reflectively [8]. Actually wear a white robe that the doctor knows the preconception in between people and to use it skillfully and operate the psychology of the patient; when is not necessary, wear a white robe in the body daringly, and it is said with [8] that is going to show a white robe figure to a patient intentionally.
"Treatment" act of the doctor for a cold

I raised that I thought that I had Martin Gardner went to a doctor at the time of cold as a bogus medical specific example in 1952 and treat it [10]. For example, a certain person goes to a doctor in the place where a cold was prolonged. I am influenced by the suggestion of the degree paper which hangs over the wall (it may be actually an imitation) and trust a doctor. The doctor does something (act such as, e.g., hitting the foot with infrared rays). Contents of "treatment" which a doctor gave, whatever it is, disappear for the symptom of a cold when I do it for approximately one week. Then the patient falls when the treatment act of the doctor certainly got over [10].

I point out that it is only mere belief that Kimihiro Yoneyama thinks, "the medicine which a doctor gave cured a cold" [11]. Even if I consult a medical practitioner, it will not take it, but 100% of cold heals and point out that it is a cold that is cured spontaneously [11]. And when I think that a doctor got over, the patient treats it particularly, in fact, what is up if I go to "doctor and wants to think with" which can cure it early and wants to think with 治 しているはずだ "by the medicine that oneself prescribes the doctor for the patient of" cold early that is a patient and a doctor see a fantasy each other, and "treatment" (the act that = truth is not treatment at all) of a cold is performed under the rule of the common fantasy [11]. That a cold is actually cured by spontaneous cure (as for the patient as for the doctor), but with that alone the person comes to go to a doctor when I want to believe it when the disease was cured by treatment and can memorize the series "that I performed it to a doctor, and a cold was cured" once when a cold is prolonged from the next [12].

I refer to "natural healing power" and "a cold"

Indication about the serious trickery medical care to hurt its health and life

The Robert Mendel loss of the doctor states, "you should be cautious in the self-interest of the doctor" [13]. I intervene in the natural change that a human body has under the name of "treatment" and receive a reward (= money) for value of the intervention, and the doctor gets an evaluation of the world [13]. When I say that it is cured with natural healing power even if I leave you unattended honestly and recommend it to go to a different doctor, the doctor cannot expect a reward [13]. Therefore I speak the Mendel loss when the doctor tends to give the person who appeared in front medical measures (when not appropriate) [13]. In addition, I state that the doctor is educated to do so it [13].

In addition, I may perform it as there is not awareness that I give false medical care to the doctor. Though a certain cure was it in the risk in the place of a medical article of the modern Western medicine and the medical study, there were many "which there was not and examples to insist on, and most of the doctors believed it, and" risk pointed out [14] and the Mendel loss that carried out the cure, and might add harm to a patient as I did not do an investigation enough. Furthermore, the thing which, in fact, is ineffective in one of treatment of the modern Western medicine 多々含 まれている [15]. On the contrary, (in the case of modern Western medicine) the Mendel loss states with "[15] that it is often said that "treatment" is much more dangerous than very disease itself".

I do it without the Medical Ethics Council that should be a check organization for the doctor originally playing a role as the check engine as the reason why false medical care prevails directly in Japan when a corrupt act spreads over the doctor repeating a problem act for not taking measures called the license deprivation indulgently [2].

I refer to "medicine source disease" and "illegal act # medicine study and the illegal act in the science"

Specific example


The work that handled false medical care

Footnote

 
"Snake oil (snake oil) of Clark Stanley"
I acquired a patent and was sold as medicine (cure-all) which worked for anything. I will point to the overall thing which turns, and is sold as medicine in spite of "snake oil" not having efficacy [16].
[Help]
  1. ^ a b Kenkyusha English-Japanese dictionary [Quackery]
  2. For ^ a b Yoshinori Sadatomo "repeating Dr. repeater - mistake that is why" or Kobunsha new book, 2,005 years, it is ISBN 9784334033118.
  3. I consider own medical care in education of ^, e.g., the modern Western medicine and the people who are trained, and got a doctor license that it is genuine, and the person who considers a medical act in the alternative medicine that it is suspicious tends that there is many it, and opposite, education of the tradition medicine and the person who is trained, and opened it consider own system to be genuine medical care and often bring the act by doctor and others of the Western medicine into question as "which, for example," side effect uses many big methods for.
  4. There is the person who relates ^ false medical care to the treatment that health insurance to be called free medical treatment or uninsured treatment is not applied to, but a problem of "the medical care / false medical care" and a problem of "the insurance application / insurance fault application" are the other problems closely. Insurance is not applied for all effective cures that there is in the world, and I let you choose it from plural cures after having told it about insurance not being applied to the treatment by the hope of that purpose patient who may be excluded of the insurance beforehand even if it is an effective cure, and the treatment act that, as a result, insurance is not applied to is performed, which means it is performed widely by various kinds of reasons (when it is fair, I may include a problem). On the other hand, there is the example (of course it is the thing which can say that it is unfair) applied insurance to even if I have a problem for a cure.
  5. ^ a b Martin Gardner 1989, p. 142.
  6. ^ Martin Gardner 1989, pp. 145-146.
  7. ^ Vreeman, Rachel C. and Carroll, Aaron E. (2007-12-20). "Medical myths". BMJ (BMJ Publishing Group) (335): 1288-1289. http://www.bmj.com/content/335/7633/1288.full. 
  8. ^ a b c d e Robert, S. When "a doctor deceives a patient" Mendel loss; 草思社, 1999 preface - Chapter 1.
  9. ^ Robert S. For Mendelsohn "Confessions of a Medical Heretic" McGraw Hill Professional, 1,990 years, it is xiii page, ISBN 978-0809241316.
  10. ^ a b Martin Gardner 1989, p. 143.
  11. For ^ a b c Kimihiro Yoneyama Tsukama bookshop, 2,005 years when "medicine is not science", it is page 128, ISBN 9784480062789.
  12. For ^ Kimihiro Yoneyama Tsukama bookshop, 2,005 years when "medicine is not science", it is page 130, ISBN 9784480062789.
  13. ^ a b c d e Robert Mendel loss 1999, p. 41.
  14. ^ Robert Mendel loss 1999, pp. 11-13.
  15. ^ a b Robert Mendel loss 1999, p. 15.
  16. ^ Oxford Dictionary "snake oil"

References

  • Mendelsohn, Robert(xiii),"Confessions of a Medical Heretic"McGraw Hill Professional,ISBN 978-0809241316
    • When "a doctor deceives a patient" Robert Mendel loss; 草思社, 1999. ISBN 9784794208545. 
  • Martin Gardner; Yasuo Ichiba reason reason "study society thought company of strange logic 1 - easiness", 1989. ISBN 9784390112888. . (original title in the Name of Science, 1952)
  • For Kimihiro Yoneyama Tsukama bookshop, 2,005 years when "medicine is not science", it is ISBN 9784480062789.
  • For Yoshinori Sadatomo "repeating Dr. repeater - mistake that is why" or Kobunsha new book, 2,005 years, it is ISBN 9784334033118.

Allied item

Allied bookm

  • For Rolf Degen "lie Yoko Akane reason of Mr. Freud", Bungeishunju Ltd., 2,003 years, it is ISBN 9784167651305. (an original title: Lexikon der Psycho-Irrtümer, 2000)
  • For written by NATROM 2,014 years when "I protect the body from dangerous anti-medical care theory and cure, hygiene because I am not deceived!" in "false medicine", it is ISBN 978-4,895,958,646
It is acquired by "https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= false medical care &oldid=61553733"

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia False medical care

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기

피드 구독하기: 댓글 (Atom)