Dosage case having too many Saitama Medical School Hospital anticancer agents
 | Most or all of these articles is based only on the only source. You perform the addition of other sources, and please cooperate with improvement of accuracy, neutrality, the reliability of the article. (November, 2014) |
The dosage case (the cuttlefish which I tore) having too many Saitama Medical School Hospital anticancer agents is the medical accident that occurred in 2000. The university professor who was a specialist in chief physician, instruction, a medical treatment director was subject to criminal charge.
Table of contents
Summary
When a high school girl (16 years old) of Konosu-shi, Saitama admitted to the Saitama Medical School synthesis medical center for right chin lower tumor treatment in September, 2000 received "VAC therapy" (therapy to put vincristine actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide sulfate together) that was one of the chemotherapy, consecutive was given the place that should be given 2 mg of sulfuric acid vincristine once a week for 12 weeks by the misreading of the documents of the doctor for one week. As a result, the patient died of multiple organ failure on October 7, the same year.
Parents with the distrust dialed 110 and, after an accident, reported it to the explanation by the doctor, and a case was found out.
Criminal liability
The Saitama Prefectural Police sent documents about chief physician, professor who was a medical treatment director at university, specialist in instruction, four people of the medic on the suspicion of professional negligence resulting in death. Falsehood medical certificate making, the use charge that listed the lie in a death certificate was added about three people except the medic. Saitama District Public Prosecutors Office prosecuted chief physician, specialist in instruction, three people of the professor for professional negligence resulting in death. However, I was not subject to criminal charge about the false death certificate making. The inquest of prosecution did a decision to assume non-prosecution disposal about the false medical certificate making injustice, but Saitama District Public Prosecutors Office gave decision to take non-prosecution action against again on August 26, 2003.
About the criminal liability, stay of execution three years establish the chief physician by first trial judgment of March 20, 2003 in the Saitama District Court for imprisonment two years. Penalty punishment of 200,000 yen was announced to the specialist in instruction for the professor who was fine 300,000 yen, a medical treatment director. The approved detective judgment was an exceptional case the managerial responsibility of the medical treatment director, but a medical treatment director pleaded not guilty as injustice by assessment of a case, and, in addition to a specialist in instruction, the prosecution appealed.
The Tokyo High Court turned on the stay of execution of three years together on December 24 of the same age and gave conviction for imprisonment one year six months to instruction medicine to a medical treatment director for imprisonment one year. The medical treatment director expressed the disapproval of judgment and appealed to a higher court more, but, on November 15, 2005, the Supreme Court dismissed the final appeal, and punishment was settled.
Civil action
The bereaved of the high school girl who died performed the civil action that demanded compensation for damages of approximately 230 million yen in total from Saitama Med. Sch. and former chief physicians six. By the civil action, the concealment act of truth elucidation and the accident of the accident became the issue. The Saitama District Court gave chief physician, specialist in instruction, doctor three of the medical treatment director an order for compensation of approximately 76 million yen in March, 2004, but, about the concealment of the accident, rejected a suit on the bereaved side. In contrast, the parents appealed promptly. The Tokyo High Court handed down a decision to give it an order for payment of approximately 83,700,000 yen in acknowledgment of the responsibility of the wrongful conduct that made a false death certificate on January 27, 2005. For this judgment, the both sides of a plaintiff, the defendant appealed to a higher court, but, on September 30, the same year, the Supreme Court dismissed a final appeal, and second trial judgment was settled. [1]
The post
After a case, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare decided the administrative deposition of the medical profession stop of three years six months from April 1, 2004 to September 30, 2007 for the chief physician. I caused administrative litigation for the cancellation of the disposal that the chief physician expresses the disapproval of this disposal and takes the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare as an opponent, but the claim was not recognized in the Supreme Court either. That the chief physician works in a hospital in Shizuoka as of 2013 [2]
Allied bookm
- Appearance river Masahiko "reportage medical accident" Asahi Shimbun publication, ISBN 978-4-02-273268-2
Footnote
- The ^ "present conditions of a doctor and the doctor license which caught the administrative deposition." The meeting (February 28, 2013) of the crime victim family. July 27, 2013 reading.
- ^ "It is the high 2 death by the medical error decision anticancer agent false dosage of Saitama Med. Sch.". 47NEWS (September 30, 2005 13:08). November 15, 2014 reading.
Allied item
Outside link
This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Dosage case having too many Saitama Medical School Hospital anticancer agents
This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.
In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.
0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기