Few decision

Assuming an opinion to remain for few agreement after a discussion with few decision (buttocks to suck to carry) a decision opinion [¹]. Or expression [²] that is used in context in protest against decision by the special privilege social position.

Summary

Being unanimous is desirable for the intention formation with the representative system in the meaning to respect a right of each person of consultation to the maximum. However, decision by the decision by majority may be usually chosen in realistic possibility to lead to agreement.

At this chance with the point of view that protects a major opinion and the possibility that it is after the next time when establish it, and there is not enough all or part for a major opinion about the opinion that investigate concord in enough discussions as a premise of the judgments, and is few at major opinion and possibility and this time when it is in the process of the discussion at the opportunity of the claim either (respect for minority opinion) [³]. Or I persuade you each other in a process of the discussion, and it is demanded that I minimize the contradiction that occurred in a major opinion and "the equality characteristics" with the minority opinion by compromising. Hans Kelsen calls a majority rule "a majority, few decision" from this point of view [⁴].

Minority opinions do not seem to be usually considered to be decision in the simple representative system. However, various partitions may be put for the real intention formation, and, as a result, there is the situation that "an agreement of the majority cannot carry out by the objection of the person having few special privileges". "Few decision" may be used in context to make fun of this. This is seen in advantages of the land-ownership (property right) of the ground incarnation starting the land purchase in case of veto and the public works project in the presidential system. When I premise a hierarchical intention formation partition, association of smallest victory is formed. When Company B holds the stocks of 51% of Company C of capital 1 million yen with the stocks of 51% of Company B of capital 1 million yen in the same way, Company A of capital 1 million yen can grasp the right of management of the whole three (investment a total of 1,980,000 yen, 100+49+49) in the owner (amount of investment 510,000 yen) holding the stocks of 51% among stockholders of Company A substantially.

Footnote

1. ^ "review plan Toshihisa Takeuchi (IIPS Policy Paper333J world peace research institute 2008.6 Foundation) P.13 (PDF) of a system design (constitution, the Diet Act) and the use of the Diet"
2. ^ "sovereignty theory (PDF) of the Shay S in 1789" Ichiro Urata (Hitotsubashi study 23:1-15,1972-07-01 Hitotsubashi University engine repository) P.12
3. It is P.13 ^ "review plan Toshihisa Takeuchi (IIPS Policy Paper333J world peace research institute 2008.6 Foundation) of a system design (constitution, the Diet Act) and the use of the Diet" (PDF)
4. P.86, the direct quotation are P.6 ^ Hans Kelsen, Yoshiji Nishijima reason "essence and value of the democracy" (PDF) (Iwanami Shoten 1969) "majority rule 鈴木宜則 (Kagoshima University Department of Education study bulletin educational science Vol. 43 1991.10.15) in the socialization education"

Allied item

• Decision by majority

This item is an unfinished item in conjunction with the social science. I demand the cooperator who corrects it, and corrects this item (PJ: social science).

It is acquired by "a few https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= decision &oldid=64128797"

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Few decision

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.