Domestic human rights engine
I am adopted in 1992 by resolution 1992/54 of the Commission on Human Rights, and a domestic human rights engine (British: National human rights institutions abbreviated designation: NHRIs) is advice, an opinion, suggestion, an engine urging about all matters for the promotion of human rights and the protection for all engines having the government, an assembly and authority for the improvement of the human rights standard of the nation of the United Nations member nation independent of the government which depends on United Nations general meeting resolution 48/134 in 1993, and is prescribed by the principle (Paris principle) about the position of the approved country mechanism. According to this principle, I establish the domestic human rights organization where 110 countries of the world are equivalent to, but do not yet exist now in Japan. [1]
The domestic human rights engine is mentioned in Vienna declaration and action plan [2] and the person with a disability right treaty [3]. In addition, Ministry of Justice introduces Japanese translation of the whole sentence about the principle (Paris principle) about the position of the domestic engine, too. [4]
Summary of the Paris principle
As for the principle about the position of the domestic engine, "a method of the activity" is comprised "constitution and a guarantee of independency and the variety" "authority and a duty" in the four branches of "the complemental principle about the position of the committee having authority of the associate judiciary". As it is prescribed in Part 1 that I advertise it with "promoting harmony with an international human rights treaty and the domestic law, rule that the nation concerned becomes the contracting party and the business and the effective enforcement of the treaty, and finding you" and a school, a university, the promotion of human rights education and the study in the workplace, the discrimination of every form particularly an effort to fight against racial discrimination, and there is not the thing that I obey expert having a tide, a university of the security of the pluralistic representative, an NGO and a professional organization, the philosophy about human rights or the religion thought and a qualification about constitution of the country mechanism and the appointment of the member in Part 2, an assembly participating, financial control of the government, and independency is spoiled, it is prescribed that I have enough financial fundamentals. It is specified about the development of group (child in particular, migrant, refugees, person with a physical disability, mental patient) protection and the relations with the associated NGO that are easy to receive the activity method, human rights violations in Part 3. I instruct authority not to state it, and to examine application, and to examine about the individual situation and mediation and relief in Part 4, and it is written down that I promote the use.
Footnote
- Action (the Japan Federation of Bar Associations) for the establishment of the ^ country human rights engine
- ^ Vienna declaration and action plan, Part 2 84 sections
- ^ person with a disability right treaty, Article 33
- ^ Principle (Paris principle) about the position of the domestic engine (Ministry of Justice)
Allied item
This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Domestic human rights engine
This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.
In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.
0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기