2018년 1월 27일 토요일

Delete sword

Delete sword

Major dress uniforms Army persons Police officials etc Prohibition on wearing outer sleeper wearing uniforms (In addition to the lucky and welfare expatriate), was issued in (9 years), in the case of wearing and soldier Contents that prohibit wearing a sword other than when wearing a uniform etc. This name is not the title of this Battle for Governor-general, but is a designation (so-called subject) attached for convenience. As an abbreviation, Abolition OrderorBand Swords Prohibition.

Prosecution of the outer sword swatch wearing a uniform wearing a large ceremonial army soldier police officer etc. - -

Known / Abbreviated | Disposing Sword Order, Swords Swords Prohibition Order | Cabinet Decree 38th Meiji 9 Effectiveness | abolition Main content | Prohibition of swords other than specific cases Article link |

table of contents

Outline

Discussion of the scrapped sword had been done since about (). When the Meiji 2 (1869) was held, the system dormitories proposal prohibited the dressing. Since "it was earlier to exclude barbarism", since it was not long before, public officials opposed, and it was rejected as "We must scrape the spirit with the scraps and to extinguish the spirit," the forest I was ordered to retire. In the Meiji 3 () generally banned, in Meiji 4 () it was issuing free swords and swords. And, on 28th March (Meiji 9), we issued a declaration of death swords.

The direct cause of the release was that the proposal of (Meiji 8) was adopted. In short, although it is a proposal of a long sentence, in short, "Although what was conventionally used was for defeating the enemy, but now it is laid and it is established, because individuals can not accept the need to sword, swift swords I want to remove the imperial number of the samurai and the surging winds of the death by giving a decree of "

Repulsion

It was not forbidden, or it was not forbidden. However, the sword was originally meaningless as a samurai 's proof rather than a real warrior, denying it was a denial of substantial privilege, and was one denial with. Those who repeled the disposal order carried the sword in a bag and carried it, or carried a sword with a shoulder and walked. In addition, some partly opposed policies including this decree, and caused them.

History of laws and ordinances

After that, due to the prohibition of possession of swords by the enforcement of the (Royal Decree No. 300 of 1950), this civil servant official lost effectiveness. Furthermore, when we decided that the effectiveness had already been lost at that point in time (Showa 29), according to the Cabinet and the Act on Organization of Principles related laws and ordinances (Act No. 203 of 1954) No. 4, in 1954 1954) and abolished the present Cabinet Order.

Related item

| There is an original text of****in Wikisource. — | —

              • \ - *

Acquired from ""

Post Date : 2018-01-27 22:00

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Delete sword

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, This site is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

0 개의 댓글:

댓글 쓰기