검색어 衆議院議員에 대한 글을 관련성을 기준으로 정렬하여 표시합니다. 날짜순 정렬 모든 글 표시
검색어 衆議院議員에 대한 글을 관련성을 기준으로 정렬하여 표시합니다. 날짜순 정렬 모든 글 표시

2016년 11월 7일 월요일

Politics of Japan

Politics of Japan

The center, the Prime Minister's office of the politics of Japan

The politics (politics just for politics of Japan) of Japan is carried out based on the system determined by the Constitution of Japan. That purpose, Japan based on the constitutionalism can say that national. In addition, the Japanese administration, judiciary is performed based on lower than which the Diet fixes for a constitution law, stipulated laws and ordinances. Therefore it may be said that Japan is a constitutional state.

The Constitution of Japan determines the sovereignty rests with the people that sovereignty keeps to the nation. In addition, I divide power in the politics into the three branches of government of a legislative power, administrative power, the judicial power and establish the system of the respective independence of powers to arrange each for the Diet, a cabinet, the court. A parliamentary system democratic government to assume the Diet the best engine of the national power is carried out, and the parliamentary cabinet system by the collaboration of the Diet and the cabinet is adopted. Furthermore, "it is the Japanese symbol of the nation and puts the Emperor who is a hereditary monarch as a symbol of the Japanese citizen unification". It provides that the Emperor does not have authority about the government in a constitution and performs "acts in matters of state" by advice and the approval of the cabinet.

The Constitution of Japan determines local autonomy again. The Japanese local autonomy is carried by two phases of local public entity of the cities, towns and villages which divided it into some areas throughout in the metropolis and districts and the metropolis and districts which divided the whole country into 47 areas throughout. A chief (prefectural governors, mayors, town managers, and village headmen) who is an assembly and the executive organ which are proceedings organization is each put in all metropolis and districts and cities, towns and villages. The local public entity can establish the regulations within the law.

It is sovereignty rests with the people, respect for fundamental human rights, three of the pacifism that three major principles of the Constitution of Japan include well. The politics of Japan is based on these three principles and personal respect (personal dignity) in the origin and is performed.

Table of contents

Political system

 
Democratic index (I show that it is a democratic country, area so that green is dark.) [1]

Full democracy:

  9.00-9.99
  8.00-8.99
Defective democracy:
  7.00-7.99
  6.00-6.99
Mixed political system:
  5.00-5.99
  4.00-4.99
The dictatorship system:
  3.00-3.99
  2.00-2.99
  1.00-1.99
Because information is insufficient; non-evaluation:
  

It is a democratic country taking a representative system [1].

Sovereign

The Japanese sovereign is the Emperor. But to this government opinion is controversial. The details refer to the Japanese sovereign.

Emperor-as-a-symbol system

The emperor-as-a-symbol system (しょうちょうてんのうせい) is a system to assume the Emperor prescribed in the Constitution of Japan a symbol of Japan and the Japanese citizen unification.

Constitution of Japan Article 1 prescribes the Emperor with Japan and "a symbol" of the Japanese citizen unification. I am considered that the position is based on the general will of the Japanese citizen as the sovereign (doctrine of democratic sovereignty) (above sentence, Article 1) and, based on the Imperial House Act that the Diet votes for, am inherited by succession (Article 2). The duties of the Emperor are limited to performing acts in matters of state (Article 7) and need advice and the approval of the cabinet (Article 3). I do not have authority about the government at all (Article 4).

State politics

 
Rule mechanism of Japan

Because the constitution top fixes the Diet for "the best engine of the national power", and it is said with "the only legislative body of the country", as for the power in the politics to be given, the Diet is the biggest (Constitution of Japan Article 41). The constitution submits a bill (cabinet presentation bill) to the Prime Minister in fact on behalf of a cabinet; authorize it (Constitution of Japan Article 72), and, as for most of of the bill to be passed in the Diet, it is a cabinet presentation bill. Therefore it is big so that the authority of the cabinet is superior to the Diet substantially, and the influence of the administration put under the cabinet is very big (exteriorization of so-called administrative state phenomenon). Furthermore, I am said to be it because staff people employed by a qualification-based appointment system, so-called bureaucrat (carrier public employee) have influence to exceed a political appointed staff job (state affairs three key posts of a minister, Senior Vice Minister, the Parliamentary Secretary) in the inside of the administration even if it is a bureaucrat nation.

In addition, the constitution gives judicial review to the court (Constitution of Japan Article 81). The court can declare whether it adapts to a constitution about laws and ordinances and the administrative act of the country including the law. Because this authority is authority to judge for an end about the propriety of the national act, it should be the strongest authority. Referring to such system, I am said to be judiciary nation. However, it is said that the court takes so-called judicial passivism and is 謙抑的 in putting an objection into for the judgment of the Diet and the cabinet (so-called political section). Particularly, in the court, there is criticism that he/she drinks it to only follow the government at time when I adopt "governing act theory" that the examination of the constitutionality for the national act having the high political nature is out of the authority of the court. In addition, an opportunity to let the judiciary reflect the opinion of the nation as the sovereign includes a "national referendum" system or the "citizen judge" system for the judge of Supreme Court in the criminal trial.

Political system (country)

Legislation

 
The Diet building

It is "the best engine of the national power", and the Constitution of Japan fixes the Diet for "the only legislative body of the country". The Diet consisting of the House of Representatives and the House of Councilors (bicameral system). All are elected directly by the nation and are comprised of a Diet member on behalf of all nations. I cannot serve as member of the House of Representatives and a member of the House of Councilors.

Diet member

The term of office of the member of the House of Representatives is four years, but loses a qualification the term of office ago when the House of Representatives is dissolved. A cabinet decides the dissolution of the House of Representatives, and the Emperor performs it. There is a debate about the substantial decision right of the dissolution of the House of Representatives [2], but it is said to the situation (Constitution of Japan Article 7) where the cabinet performs advice and approval for acts in matters of state of the Emperor that a cabinet taking responsibility has a substantial decision right for acts in matters of state of the Emperor in business today because there is it [3]. When motion of no confidence is approved and does not do a cabinet resignation en masse for ten days, you must make dissolution of the House of Representatives (Constitution of Japan Article 69), but, in the cabinet, the House of Representatives is understood based on constitution Article 7 other than it by the discretion when I can be dissolved. In addition, expression, there is at least 形式的宣示権 of the dissolution of the House of Representatives to the constitutional Emperor although there is a fight in a theory about the point called the substantial decision right of the dissolution of the House of Representatives (Constitution of Japan Article 7 3), and motion of no confidence "dissolves the House of Representatives by Constitution of Japan Article 7." by Constitution of Japan Article 69 about the words of the dissolution Imperial rescript [4], today whether the approval or a cabinet vote of confidence is a rejected case establishes it. As for this, the dissolution of the House of Representatives is carried out with an Imperial rescript, but Constitution of Japan Article 7 has the direct grounds of the Imperial rescript; again these words for all reasons of the dissolution collect it, and is because is understood that can generally apply it about the dissolution of the House of Representatives of any case [5]; [6]. For details, I refer to dissolution of the House of Representatives.

The election of the member of the House of Representatives is called a general election. Half is re-elected every three years in six years in the term of office of the member of the House of Councilors. The election of the member of the House of Councilors is called an ordinary election.

As for the general election of the House of Representatives, single-member electorate system and the single-seat constituencies proportional representation standing side by side system that proportional representation (fixed-list system) is used together are adopted, and, as for the ordinary election of the House of Councilors, proportional representation (open-list system) is used together with a constituency system (major constituency system, medium constituency system). The fixed number the House of Representatives 480 (single-seat constituencies election member of the Diet 300, proportional representation election member of the Diet 180), the House of Councilors 242 (electoral district election member of the Diet 146, proportional representation election member of the Diet 96).

Kind, session of the Diet

The Diet is obliged to carry out the annual call, and a regular assembly (ordinary session of the Diet) means this. In addition, by the demand of oneself or the Diet member of the number of the uniformity, a cabinet can decide the call of the Diet temporarily, and a cabinet calls this extraordinary session of a local assembly (extraordinary session of the Diet). A regular assembly is convened in January in an average year after (1992) in 1992, and extraordinary session of a local assembly is convened in about September. Extraordinary session (extraordinary session) is convened after the member of the House of Representatives general election and appoints the Prime Minister.

In the Diet, a session system is adopted, and double-deliberation prohibition is fixed for a principle of noncontinuance of the session. With the principle of noncontinuance of the session, the bill which was careless in a decision during a session is withdrawal (extinction) and the principle that it is unless I am said to be the independent principle in a session, and a decision of the continuous deliberation is accomplished. Double-deliberation prohibition is the general rule that I cannot submit the bill voted for to again during the same session once.

A session of the regular assembly is 150 days, and only one time of extension is possible. Fate, the extension are possible to twice by a decision of the both Houses agreement in the session of extraordinary session of a local assembly and the extraordinary session each time. Supremacy of the House of Representatives is accepted about the decision of the session and the extension and depends on a decision of the House of Representatives when the decision of both houses of Representatives and Councilors is incongruous and when the House of Councilors does not vote.

Legislation process

The draft of a proposed law (bill) is submitted by each Diet member and cabinet. A bill submitted by a Diet member is called legislation introduced by a Diet member or a bill introduced by a member of the House of Representatives (the bill that member of the House of Representatives submitted), legislation introduced by a Diet member (the bill that a member of the House of Councilors submitted), and a submitted bill is called a cabinet presentation bill (government-sponsored bill) or a cabinet bill from the cabinet. About 30% are legislation introduced by a Diet member, and, among the presentation bills in 1 session, 70% become a cabinet presentation bill now. As for the enactment rate (ratio of thing formed among submitted bills), legislation introduced by a Diet member is around 20%; the cabinet presentation bill more than 80%. Therefore, a cabinet submitted the most of the law to be passed. I pick the Prime Minister from the Diet, and this is a conclusion of adopting the parliamentary cabinet system that the Prime Minister crosses a cabinet. The cabinet collaborates with the ruling party producing the Prime Minister and tries for the enactment of cabinet presentation bill.

Enactment of cabinet presentation bill process

  1. As for the original bill of the cabinet presentation bill, each ministries and government offices having jurisdiction over it make first plan, and the opinion adjustment with relevant ministries and agencies and the ruling party, a question to the council, the hearing in the public hearing are performed.
  2. When the draft of a proposed law presentation is in sight, the control government office performs law culture work and makes the original bill of the draft of a proposed law.
  3. When there is the original bill of the draft of a proposed law at a control government office, the original bill receives preliminary examination of Cabinet Legislation Bureau. In Cabinet Legislation Bureau, I examine it about the consistency with a constitution and other laws and ordinances, sequence or a term of the letter of the law.
  4. When preliminary examination is over, I file for 閣議請議 about Diet presentation for the Prime Minister from the minister of state of the chief. The Cabinet Secretariat which is a window of 閣議請議 sends 請議案 which I accepted to Cabinet Legislation Bureau. Cabinet Legislation Bureau performs the final examination and makes modifications as needed and sends it to the Cabinet Secretariat.
  5. In 請議案 made 閣議請議, the explanation of the summary is carried out from the Director-General of the Cabinet Legislation Bureau in a cabinet meeting. It becomes the official draft of a proposed law when approved in a Cabinet meeting without demur. This draft of a proposed law is submitted to the Diet (the House of Representatives or the House of Councilors) by the Prime Minister.

Establishment process of the legislation introduced by a Diet member

  1. The member of the Diet discusses it with much staff including a public employee of the staff, relevant ministries and agencies and the local public entity of government-paid secretary, private secretary, policy charge secretary, Diet Legislative Bureau and National Diet Library, other brainy people, private enterprises and groups, democracy in the development of the draft of a proposed law. Particularly, the Diet Legislative Bureau performs the consistency investigation with a constitution and other laws and ordinances, the making of the draft of a proposed law summary, the article culture of the draft of a proposed law from the specialized standpoint of the legislation technology and approves inside the department examination and the legislation chief of the bureau of the draft of a proposed law.
  2. It is exchanged a hand by a member of the Diet who is a client, and the draft of a proposed law that passed through examination of the Diet Legislative Bureau is taken for the bill examination procedure in the position political party.
  3. I need the agreement that is higher than ten members of the Diet more than 20 members of the Diet in the House of Councilors in the House of Representatives so that a member of the Diet proposes a bill. But I need the agreement that is higher than 20 members of the Diet more than 50 members of the Diet in the House of Councilors in the House of Representatives to propose the draft of a proposed law with the budget.
  4. After examination of the Diet Legislative Bureau, the draft of a proposed law that prepared a predetermined supporter is submitted to the chairperson.

Process of the draft of a proposed law submitted to the Diet

  1. The draft of a proposed law submitted to is referred to the suitable committee by the chairperson of the Diet (the Diet of the first debate) submitted to.
  2. At first the minister of state of the chief performs the suggestion reason explanation of the draft of a proposed law and, in the committee where a draft of a proposed law was referred to, begins examination. The examination is carried out in the form of the questions and answers about the draft of a proposed law for the public employees of minister of state, Senior Vice Minister, Parliamentary Secretary and others from a member of the Diet. When a question, the discussion in the committee performed an end, a chairperson declares an end and refers it to a decision.
  3. After the examination of the draft of a proposed law in the committee was finished, the deliberation of the draft of a proposed law is put into a plenary session. In the plenary session, a report is carried out about the examination in the committee from the chairperson whom a draft of a proposed law was referred to. As discussion, the speech from a viewpoint opposite to a draft of a proposed law, the speech from an agreeable viewpoint are carried out as needed. A report is announced as a result of committee decision by the chairperson and, after discussion, begins voting.
  4. When a draft of a proposed law is approved in a plenary session, a draft of a proposed law is sent to other Diet by the chairperson. In the Diet which received sending, voting is taken after the examination of the committee, the deliberation of the plenary session.
  5. When a constitution has the special fate, the draft of a proposed law becomes the law except (local autonomy special laws) when I approved it in two Houses of the Diet of the House of Representatives and the House of Councilors.
  6. When a law was passed, from the chairperson of the Diet of the post-Diet session deliberation, it is done 奏上 via a cabinet by the Emperor. The Emperor performs the approval (I do John Hancock and seal it in Imperial Seal) of the draft made 奏上 and is gone back up in the cabinet.
  7. The law must be promulgated within 30 days from a day done 奏上. In the promulgation of the law, the minister of state of the chief signs, and the Prime Minister countersigns it. The law is promulgated by placing it in the official daily gazette.
  8. The promulgated law is enforced on a day set in an additional clause. On an enforcement day, I can establish it in "a day to establish it by a government ordinance in the range that reckons it from a day of the promulgation, and does not exceed ○ age" and an additional clause.

Political party

The Constitution of Japan does not have the rule about the political party. As for the Political Funds Control Law, the vote total number in a thing having a Diet member more than five people or the most recent general election or the most recent ordinary election or the ordinary election before the most recent ordinary election defines the thing which there is more than two-100ths of effective total votes as "a political party" among "political organizations".

I set a report, earnings call duty of this "political party" and transparentize the political fund and, among political parties, perform the furtherance by the public funding for political parties to a thing having a Diet member.

55 system

The state that a minor political party separated continued after the war for ten years, but the system established it in 55 by a right wing and the left of the Social Democratic Party Japan unifying it in (1955) in 1955, and the Japan Democratic Party and the Liberal Party doing combination (conservative merger), and the Liberal Democratic Party having been established. The Liberal Democratic Party always became the ruling party by the system in 55, and the president of the Liberal Democratic Party was appointed in the Diet by the Prime Minister. A one-party cabinet of the Liberal Democratic Party continued except (from 1983 (1983) to 1986 (1986)) for a long time at the time when coalition government with New Liberal Club which some members of the Liberal Democratic Party left the party and made was crossed.

Process from the Hosokawa non-LDP coalition government to the LDP and New Komeito coalition government

The Liberal Democratic Party was divided in (1993) in 1993, and a no-confidence motion of the Miyazawa Cabinet was approved in the House of Representatives, and the House of Representatives was dissolved. Some members of the Liberal Democratic Party left the party and formed New Party Sakigake, a new life party, and, in a general election performed after this, the Liberal Democratic Party fell below the majority of the thing which almost maintained the power before the public announcement. By extraordinary session convened after this election, Morihiro Hosokawa of the Japanese new party was nominated for the Prime Minister, and Hosokawa cabinet was crossed by the Social Democratic Party Japan, a new life party, the New Komeito, Japan new party, the Democratic Socialist Party, New Party Sakigake, Social Democratic Federation, a coalition of the democratic reform alliance, and the system collapsed in 55. This coalition was the next Haneda Cabinet, but became few ruling party cabinets because the Social Democratic Party Japan expressed the coalition secession just after prime minister nomination although I was maintained.

The Haneda Cabinet performed a cabinet resignation en masse (1994) in June in 1994, and the Diet nominated Tomiichi Murayama of the Social Democratic Party Japan for the Prime Minister, and the Liberal Democratic Party, the Social Democratic Party Japan, a coalition cabinet (own company, さ coalition government) of New Party Sakigake were crossed. This coalition was maintained in the first next Hashimoto Cabinet (as for the outside the Cabinet cooperation until 1998 (1998) June of the second Hashimoto Cabinet).

The Obuchi Cabinet became the coalition cabinet (Obuchi Cabinet first remodeling cabinet) of the Liberal Democratic Party and the Liberal Party (1999) in January in 1999, and the New Komeito increased in October of the year, too (Obuchi Cabinet second remodeling cabinet, own LDP and New Komeito coalition cabinet). 翌2000年(平成12年)に自由党は分裂して、離党した一部議員が保守党(後に保守新党)を結成し、連立に残留した(第1次森内閣、自公保政権)。 この連立は、次の小泉内閣でも維持されたが、2003年(平成15年)11月の第43回衆議院議員総選挙後に保守新党が自民党に吸収され、自民党・公明党の連立(自公連立政権)となり、2009年(平成21年)8月の第45回衆議院議員総選挙において、自民党、公明党が大敗し、野党になるまで続いた。

現在の政治状況

2012年(平成24年)12月16日に執行された第46回衆議院議員総選挙において、与党の民主党国民新党が大敗し、同年12月26日自由民主党公明党による連立政権が発足した。現在、内閣総理大臣自由民主党総裁安倍晋三が務めている。

国会に議席を持つ主要政党日本の政党一覧も参照のこと。)

与党

野党

行政

行政権は内閣に属する。

国会議員の中から、国会の議決によって内閣総理大臣が指名される。内閣総理大臣は天皇に任命される。内閣総理大臣は国務大臣を任命し、内閣総理大臣と国務大臣の合議体である内閣を構成する。内閣総理大臣は国務大臣を任意に罷免することができる。内閣総理大臣は国会議員の中から指名されるが、国務大臣は過半数が国会議員であればよい。

以下の場合には内閣は総辞職する。

  • 衆議院による内閣不信任→衆議院が解散されないとき
  • 内閣総理大臣が欠けたとき
  • 衆議院議員の総選挙の後に初めて国会が召集されたとき

司法

司法権は最高裁判所および法律により設置される下級裁判所に属する。

終審裁判所である最高裁判所は、長たる裁判官(最高裁判所長官)とその他の最高裁判所裁判官から構成される。最高裁判所長官は内閣が指名し、天皇が任命する。その他の最高裁判所裁判官は、内閣が任命する。最高裁判所長官とその他の最高裁判所裁判官は、任命後、国民審査を受ける。その後10年を経過するごとに、さらに国民審査を受ける。最高裁判所の裁判官は、法律で定めた年齢(70歳)に達すると退官する。

下級裁判所(高等裁判所地方裁判所家庭裁判所簡易裁判所)の裁判官は、最高裁判所の指名した者の名簿により、内閣が任命する。下級裁判所の裁判官は、任期を10年とし、再任されることができる。下級裁判所の裁判官の定年は65歳(簡易裁判所裁判官は70歳)である。

地方の政治

都道府県および市町村の議会の議員、都道府県知事および市町村長は、すべて住民に選挙され、任期はいずれも4年間である。

政治制度(地方)

政治の清廉度

トランスペアレンシー・インターナショナルドイツNGO)によれば、2015年における当国の腐敗認識指数は18位である[7]

外交関係

日本は国際連合加盟国で、安全保障理事会の常任理事国入りを目指しているG4諸国の一つである他に、東アジアにおいて重要な役割を果たしている。

日本国憲法は、日本が武力を以て、他国との間で戦闘を交えることを禁じている。一方で、日本には、陸海空から成る自衛隊が組織されており、2003年から2009年にかけて、自衛隊がイラクへ派遣された。これは、第二次世界大戦以降では、日本が初めて海外に武装組織を派遣した瞬間だった。

経済大国としては、日本は主要国首脳会議 (G8) およびアジア太平洋経済協力 (APEC) の参加国である他、ASEANとの間では、ASEAN+3として関係を発展させている上に、東アジアサミットにも参加している。国際援助および開発支援の場でも日本は大きな貢献者であり、2004年には、同年の国民総所得の0.19%を援助金に充てた[8]

領土に関しては、北方領土を巡ってロシアと対立している他に、韓国から日本固有の領土である竹島を、独島と称して自国の領土であると主張されたり、日本海の呼称を東海に変更するよう求める活動を実施されたりしている。また、中国および台湾との間には尖閣諸島に関する問題、さらに中国との間では沖ノ鳥島の位置付けを巡る議論がある。これらの領土問題は、ある面では、それらの島の周囲の海域に埋蔵されていると推定される、石油天然ガスといった天然資源および海洋生物資源を自国の支配下に置くための紛争であると見ることもできる。

北朝鮮との間では、同国による日本人の拉致核兵器開発疑惑に関連する問題が現在進行中である。

脚注

[ヘルプ]
  1. ^ a b The EIU Democracy Index for the year 2014 民主主義指数では「完全な民主主義」とされている(2014年)。
  2. ^ 佐藤幸治編 『要説コンメンタール 日本国憲法』 三省堂、1991年、58-59頁
  3. ^ 松澤浩一著 『議会法』 ぎょうせい、1987年、341頁
  4. ^ 佐藤幸治編 『要説コンメンタール 日本国憲法』 三省堂、1991年、58頁
  5. ^ 浅野一郎・河野久著 『新・国会事典―用語による国会法解説』 有斐閣、2003年、35頁
  6. ^ 芦部信喜編 『演習憲法』 青林書院、1984年、513-514頁
  7. ^ "CPI 2015 table". Transparency International. 2016年1月28日閲覧。
  8. ^ Net Official Development Assistance In 2004 (PDF, 32.9 KiB) , Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 11 April 2005. Retrieved 14 May 2006.

関連項目

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Politics of Japan

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.

2016년 7월 8일 금요일

Revolt of Kato

Revolt of Kato

A series of Cabinet-overthrow movements that Koichi Kato, Taku Yamazaki and others of the ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party caused the revolt (father does not appear) of Kato for the second forest Cabinet overthrow in November, 2000. It is so-called forest lowering. Another name is the Kato political situation, YK revolution.

Table of contents

Summary

When an opposition party showed movement to submit a forest no-confidence motion against the Cabinet to for House of Representatives this meeting of November 20, 2000, I declared it when the Diet member of Koichi Kato (Kato group's chairperson) and the comrade agreed or I was absent. I showed the posture that Taku Yamazaki (Yamasaki group's chairperson) who was a sworn friend of Kato tuned to this as Yamasaki group.

As for the seat of the House of Representatives, the ruling party exceeded 272 of 480 people 31 than the majority fortune-telling, but if 64 people of 45 Kato groups of the House of Representatives and 19 Yamasaki groups in total rebel, a nonconfidence motion in the Cabinet is approved and the forest cabinet is a cabinet resignation en masse or is forced to dissolution of the House of Representatives in those days. This remark caused independence from the LDP of the Kato group, various suppositions including the political reorganization.

By party tightening by Hiromu Nonaka of the party whip head, the intention of Kato failed, but the confusion in the LDP continued accelerating fall of the Morimasa right still more, and Kato, Yamasaki suffered a big wound among YKK said to be candidate next-generation leader. As a result, it may be said that it was an important foreshadowing of the Junichiro Koizumi election by the spring LDP presidential election as for this political drama in the next year.

Remote cause

Kato and Yamazaki who were achieving the results as the candidate president steadily in succession to a faction. I was defeated by Keizo Obuchi of President prior expected present post though I ran for President of the LDP election of September, 1999 as the gateway of the candidate president. But, Obuchi who prayed for the reappointment by the not voting flew into a rage with two presidential election runs in itself for Kato, Yamazaki who thought of himself/herself the gateway to the last. In addition, it conflicted with the wrath of Obuchi that Kato challenged Obuchi to a policy debate. It is Obuchi who went by gentle personality, but draws off Kato, Yamasaki group thoroughly saying "that fellow was going to push me aside". It was usual for the political dispute that the non-mainstream was drawn off, but the correspondence of Obuchi was beyond the category. By single-member electorate system introduction, the power of the executives became gradually strong, and the viewpoint of the non-faction in power became still severer.

Kato at the time was strong in the image of the reformist (a policy claim was supported about finance with Obuchi conclusively by a difference, the financial healthy group and principle of market group) and started the name in politician rankings to want you to become the prime minister in the high rank. In addition, I was recognized to be the candidate president first person as 宏池会会長 of the main group of a conservative party and "the eldest son of YKK" in a party second faction. However, Obuchi falls down while it continues being aired in the non-faction in power, and means of escape cannot find, and Prime Minister forest is born in opaque form by so-called group of 5.

Before the Obuchi reelection, Kato was the place where public attention accorded with No. 1 candidate of post-Obuchi in the politics. This is because there were the head of the faction of the main group of a conservative party, cooperation to Hashimoto, Obuchi Administration birth, the results of the New Frontier Party splitting as the chief secretary. However, Kato at the time refused the prime minister assumption of office in the form carried on the shoulder in the Obuchi group (old Takeshita group, Tanaka group). It is from the source of the anti-Takeshita group as YKK, repulsion to government dual structure under the Takeshita group (Kanemaru) influence of the Miyazawa Cabinet. However, the assumption of office was considered to be 云 わば postponement because I demanded an ideal from a prime minister form of oneself too much. In the forest Cabinet, the cabinet support rate continued being sluggish by a God's country remark, the resignation by the scandal of Chief Cabinet Secretary Hidenao Nakagawa while a fret of Kato who fell for the turn with the forest was decided, and unpopularity reached the peak.

It was expected that the LDP suffered a crushing defeat when I entered into the Upper House election as the forest Cabinet where had low support of the nation in 2001 and the ruling party broke the House of Councilors majority in conjunction with Representative non-reelection by the Upper House election in 1998 when the LDP was defeated (divided parliament) and was concerned. The executives were going to take Kato, Yamasaki in the faction in power at one time, and Prime Minister Mori realized entering cabinet minister of Chairman of the Executive Council appointment and Okiharu Yasuoka of Sadatoshi Ozato who was the request of the Kato group by personnel affairs, Yamasaki group last time, but it put distance only for the act to lower own popularity for Kato different in the economic fiscal policy with the forest conclusively with the forest without it being.

It was a sworn friend of Kato, and cooperation with Kato was a main premise, and Kato was a thought called Yamasaki next, and Yamazaki intended to follow Kato after entering politics thoroughly earlier even if the government design opened. In addition, only the way had a way out in the situation at the time more and more.

Strategic of Kato

Kato took the tactics to appeal to public opinion through media and website, 2.ch (uses it with approval on the administration side formally) [the source required] and collected public interest widely. The news programs which broadcasted a special feature program recorded all high television ratings on the no-confidence night of the day, and the taxi, the bar, the public bath gathered interest of the world so that users usually decreased sharply in comparison with a day. In addition, Kato declares 2 ちゃんねらーであることを openly by the 2.ch-related articles in the book thing.

As for Kato, some secession of the Kato group was within the expectation, but were convinced to the number of people to pass a nonconfidence motion if there was hardly that I was levelled.

Naturally I thought that Kato left the LDP for nonconfidence motion rejection exceedingly, and media, the world took part in the Democratic Party, but insisted when Kato remained in the LDP and aimed at reform to the last in the LDP. At the time of 2000, as for all past various power that left the LDP, there was that politics influence became small from LDP being on the register roll time if an opportunity was over in mind of Kato with a transient thing [1].

Remark of Kato

At the time of an intention expression
"I do not let Prime Minister Mori reorganize it."
When a story of the reshuffle appeared at the meeting with political observers (face resisting Tsuneo Watanabe, Shigezo Hayasaka, Keiichiro Nakamura, Hisashi Miyake, the Taro Yayama and others Nakasone group) in a Japanese restaurant "mountain village" in Hotel Okura Tokyo of Toranomon on the night of November 9, I declare the overthrowing the Cabinet. A revolt of Kato began with this remark [2].
Because Nakamura was Special Advisor to the Cabinet, the overthrowing the Cabinet declaration of Kato was handed down to Prime Minister Mori immediately from Nakamura.
After excessive issue life
"A phone number of Kan enters my mobile phone"
I appealed to the media for close relations with Naoto Kan and Yukio Hatoyama flourishingly.
Just before voting
"A long drama begins from now on."
"Can win, but I may not become the prime minister this time, and the next may be Kawano 100%" (Minister of Foreign Affairs Yohei Kawano); (being conscious of an insinuation to degree and oneself proper)
(telephone to Representative aide at the point in time when majority maneuvering of the splitting began on the early morning of 17th)
After a revolt
"I (Kato) expected a change in the LDP inside, and the nation expected the change of politics across the LDP, and this was big miscalculation" (by "a Sunday project")

Neighboring remarks and action

Ryutaro Hashimoto

On the night of November 11, I spoke, "Kato should let you dance a cat dance on one of a hot frying pan" at the meeting of the open mainstream 5 faction in Akasaka Prince Hotel of Tokyo, Kioicho.

Before this remark, each influential person gave comment to criticize Kato, but I escalated, and Hashimoto performed this remark. I was targeted for suitable criticism from the public opinion of the side that supported Kato, and criticism appeared for this comment from the faction in power if vulgar.

Junichiro Koizumi

Koizumi receives consultation from Kato about this matter in a consensus of opinion gidayu reciter's book conference room. Koizumi told, "I work as me earlier" in that, and there was the direction that I interpreted when Kato got the support (at least personal support) of Koizumi. It "was recognized at a stretch that rising to action of Kato was genuine from the place that confirmed it, and stated the person, "Kato is serious" Koizumi of the relation between YKK when と told whether media rose to action Kato after the night meeting with commentators."

Koizumi who declared, "I become political Koizumi from Koizumi of the policy" drained information from the situation that took the chairperson of the forest group which was a native place faction of Prime Minister Mori as soon as I knew it if Kato was serious into the media and Nonaka and others party influential person positively saying "Kato agrees to a nonconfidence motion" and turned around for a role to persuade the young person and others that Kato group and Yamasaki group, Kato were near in cooperation with a Nonaka and others party influential person opposed for a policy and objected to a nonconfidence motion.

I left it with Representative part of the forest group about YKK and called Koizumi with Kato, Taku Yamazaki in some media (news program "broadcasters" of TBS TV), and it was reported about the case which joined Kato, but the third dimension was thin.

It attracted attention that Koizumi spoke "YKK with the friendship and the dual structure of the calculation" at the party where YKK attended after a revolt for the first time. The comparison of Koizumi who spoke with a smile and Kato, the expression with Yamasaki that heard a remark with an expression of the distress left an impression for an audience (Koizumi is not YKK, and the origin is to Fukuda to the last, and it is realized later by Kato, Yamazaki that it was a politician regarding a forest group as most important).

Hiromu Nonaka

Chief Secretary Hiromu Nonaka of the Hashimoto group was natural and criticized an action of Kato and led the splitting. I levelled it substantially and became the position of the total person in charge of the side and did 多々出演 in the media. I take even the action to attend at a meeting of Hokkaido on Sunday of Saturday and Sunday before the nonconfidence presentation said to be (level it, and work is full of tops) which all is decided on (I appear in a political allied program of Sunday by broadcast). Different in a remark to have shown the posture that is nothing, and is very bullish of "the striking off a name" before the weekend, but to leave an implication for by a TV remark of Sunday conditionally (Sadatoshi Ozato continued negotiations with Nonaka, Aoki and others intermittently under the surface of the water).

Nonaka declared openly that I made Kato the Prime Minister until Kato kept Keisei-Kai and distance and did not hesitate once. Kato assisted it as acting chief secretary for the chief secretary era in 1996, and the drawing of the conservative member of the Diet from the New Frontier Party was the relation that I made it and gave the result of the House of Representatives working majority of the LDP to. However, it was anti-Kato after it because the Chief Cabinet Secretary was dropped and got involved by Kato having run in form against intention of Obuchi by LDP presidential election of 1999 (for the reason of having been close to Kato).

Kiichi Miyazawa

It is said that it was fanned whether Kato got the consent of "the revolt" from Kiichi Miyazawa according to Koichi Hamada beforehand. Thus, I cannot but attach a question mark when I see an action of later Miyazawa. As a behind-the-scenes story, Tetsuya Miyazaki gives a Miyazawa wirepuller theory by an M2 talk with Shinji Miyadai later, too.

When it is a dinner party with Miyazawa of the day before, and Kato explains a plan, it is said that Miyazawa took the manner that answers in the affirmative, and pushes it from behind to Kato, but Miyazawa agrees with Hamada, the Miyazaki source at the point that did not give Kato a clear pledge.

It is said that originally Miyazawa wanted to hand over a faction to Kawano not Kato. It may be said that the point that I trusted naively was shown sweetness of the final stage as the politician without being able to see through political finesse of Miyazawa. However, Kato after the later member of the Diet resignation, restart had conviction that over-optimism of stuffing was the resource that rather attractive or political resources of Kato could use.

その証拠に、今まで加藤があまり顧みることの無かった地元の小さな集会や居酒屋などの会合に積極的に参加するようになり加藤は以前にも増して人間の幅が広がったという見方をされている。

民主党・自由党

自由党党首小沢一郎は11月17日(金曜日)に不信任決議案を提出するよう民主党代表鳩山由紀夫に主張したが、これは週末議員が地元に戻り、後援者から不信任案への対応を考え直すよう説得される危険性が考えられるためだった。

しかし、加藤が土日で逆に派内議員を説得すると主張し、鳩山は11月20日(月曜日)に提出、結果的に土日に切り崩され、加藤派所属衆議院議員の半数は加藤と袂を分かった。

乱失敗後、小沢は「男子じゃないな」とコメントしている[3]

加藤派・山崎派の現役閣僚の動き

現役閣僚だった山崎派の保岡興治法務大臣と加藤派の森田一運輸大臣は加藤・山崎の倒閣に表立って動けなかったものの、2人は加藤・山崎両派が内閣不信任案に賛成することを最終決定した場合、森首相に辞表を提出して不信任票を投ずることも考えていた[4]。結局、加藤・山崎派が欠席戦術に切り替えたため、保岡と森田は出席して信任票を投じた。なお、加藤派の吉川芳男労働大臣は参議院議員のため衆議院の内閣不信任採決には関与していないが、加藤の乱には反対する意向を示した。

12月5日の内閣改造で上記3人は大臣職を解かれている。

執行部の切り崩し工作

執行部は加藤の同調者への切り崩し手段として、公認権を最大限活用した[5]

野中は内閣不信任案が可決された場合、森内閣に解散総選挙を求めるつもりであった。野中は2000年11月17日に、都道府県連に総選挙の準備を指示している。同時に不信任案の採決に賛成したり欠席したりした議員は除名もしくは公認しないことを決めた。また、小選挙区支部長の「差し替え」、つまり対立候補の擁立も考えていたという[5]

二大政党による対決が中心となる小選挙区制では二大政党の候補とならないと当選するのは難しい。また第一野党である民主党への合流という選択肢を事実上封じている中で元々の所属政党である自民党から公認されないことになると、二大政党間で埋没する中で当選が難しい選挙になってしまう可能性が出てきたため、加藤の同調者の多くは動揺し、加藤は同調者を十分集められなかったのである[5]

切り崩し終盤には加藤・山崎に除名届を内容証明郵便で送るなど徹底して除名の意思を崩さなかった。まず、加藤との決別を表明したベテランメンバーの中に宮澤の名前があったことが大きかった。それに続いて、切り崩しが進み形勢が微妙だった時点で加藤の政権構想立案を担当した丹羽雄哉や加藤の側近中の側近と言われた古賀誠が離反したことで形勢は一気に決まった。

顛末

党内の国会議員に同調者が広がらず、ベテラン議員の中に保守本流を自認する自派が党を割ることや野党の不信任案に同調するという禁じ手への不満・不安がある中で、野中を中心とする執行部が除名を強硬に主張して切り崩された結果、加藤の腹心でもある小里貞利総務会長の説得を受け入れ欠席戦術に切り替えた。これを加藤は涙ながらに「名誉ある撤退」と呼んだ。

「大将なんだから」

加藤派の議員が切り崩された中で敗北を確信した加藤、山崎が両派合同総会を開き、その後の対応を協議する場面の一部がそのままテレビで放映された。

会合は、午後9時30分よりホテルオークラ東京で開催。途中、加藤・山崎の2人が単独で議場で不信任票を投じに行くと発言する。派閥領袖の単独での不信任投票は自分が起こした倒閣運動には党除名になっても一議員として最終的な責任を全うする一方で、非主流派として冷遇されるまで加藤・山崎に従った議員には党除名という辛酸に合わせないための配慮とされた。しかし、宣言して本会議場に向かおうとする加藤の肩を加藤派の谷垣禎一がつかみ「加藤先生は大将なんだから! 独りで突撃なんてダメですよ! 加藤先生が動く時は俺たちだってついていくんだから!」と懸命に慰留した。また、同じ加藤派の杉山憲夫も加藤の側で谷垣の発言に頷きながら「死ぬも生きるも一緒だ」と慰留に努めた。

側近たちの涙ながらの説得に加藤は顔を紅潮し、涙をにじませ、歯を食いしばりながら立ちつくす。加藤派、山崎派は全員で欠席することを確認し、残った議員での派閥の結束力を確認した。

印象的なこのシーンは、加藤の乱を回顧する場合、その挫折を象徴するシーンとして必ず用いられるものであり、谷垣禎一の人物紹介でも欠かせない映像となっている。

派閥の分裂

この政局の結果、加藤派・宏池会は以下の様に分裂した。

宏池会の源流的存在の宮澤・鈴木・池田らが反対に周り、加藤の有力側近まで反対に周りベテランは追従し、宏池会の大勢は反対が決定的となった。

両グループは2008年に合流するまで双方が宏池会を名乗る異常事態となっていた。

  • また、上記どちらのグループにも属さず、一時無所属、あるいは現在も無所属を通している議員も存在する。

加藤派

当時、世論の森政権・自民党への支持が極端に低かったことから、加藤への期待感がとても大きかったにも関わらず、離党は拒否し、投票も棄権したことにより逆に加藤への失望感や批判が渦巻いた。

加藤派の人数が大幅に減少し第2派閥から第6派閥に転落したこと、内閣改造と党役員改選によって加藤派の小里貞利が総務会長を離任し、森田一や吉川芳男が閣僚離任したことによって、加藤の党内影響力が大幅に低下した。さらに南青山マンション疑惑や秘書逮捕などによって加藤紘一は派閥会長辞任、党離党、議員辞職に追い込まれ、総理総裁候補から完全に脱落した。

議員辞職後の衆院選で議員当選して国政に復帰。自民党に復党し、加藤派の後継である小里派の最高顧問に就任したが、加藤及び小里派の政界影響力には既に限界があった。この様なことから、小里派も派の看板を将来の総裁候補と呼ばれていた谷垣に切り替えた。谷垣は小派閥出身者ながらも小泉内閣で財務相に就任しポスト小泉の一人として認知されるようになった。

加藤が倒閣運動を起こさなければ、派閥分裂は起こらず第2派閥領袖としての地位を保ち、2001年2月のえひめ丸事故を契機とするポスト森において、加藤が総理総裁になっていたと見る向きも多い。

山崎派

一方、山崎派は離脱者は現役閣僚のために身動きが取れなかった保岡興治を除けば実質1人(稲葉大和)に留まり、派閥の結束を党内に知らしめた。乱に参加したこと自体には党内から批判を浴びたものの、小所帯ながらも、かつて鉄の団結を誇った田中派を彷彿とさせる結束に党内から感嘆の声が上がった。

しかしながら、結束は保ったとは言え、加藤の乱以後は内閣改造で保岡が閣僚離任をして山崎派の閣僚が1人もいなくなり、党内での影響力は更に落ち込み窮していた。この間、加藤派との合流や民主党への合流が噂されたが、小泉総裁誕生後は山崎が幹事長、その後副総裁に就任し、主流派となるなど、山崎と山崎派は党内で一定の影響力を維持することに成功した。

橋本派

主流派・執行部側として乱の沈静化にあたった野中を中心とする橋本派は面目躍如となった。しかし、決議案投票に若手数人が棄権した。鉄の団結を誇るとされた橋本派の足元が最初に揺らいだ場面となった。それまでにも分裂等を経験していた橋本派であったが、それまでの分裂・離脱は派内有力者に引っ張られるケースであった。今回の離脱は、若手自らの意思によるもので派閥の影響力にほころびが見えてきた例となった。

以前からの森の不適切発言が連続し支持率が急落していたため橋本派内では森擁護の意欲が薄れていた。加藤の乱自体は徹底して沈静化したものの、乱沈静化前後で「乱そのものは徹底的に鎮圧するが、決して森内閣を今後も支援していくわけではない」といったニュアンスの発言が橋本派幹部から多々出ており、既に橋本派内で森政権維持を断念・拒否したとすら見られる動きが出ていた。乱後は森政権から距離を置き始め、ポスト森を模索するようになった。これに小泉が激怒して当初は勝ち目のないと言われた総裁選出馬へ向かう事になる。

森喜朗

もしこの加藤の乱が成功して内閣不信任決議可決が確実となった場合、解散総選挙を強硬に促していた野中幹事長に反して党内融和を優先して、衆議院解散をせず内閣総辞職し、加藤に政権を渡す予定だったとされる。

不信任の対象となっていた内閣の首相だった森は2001年に内閣総辞職するも、次の首相には自派閥出身の小泉純一郎が選出され、派閥会長と後見人という立場で党内影響力を維持し、自ら率いる派閥(森派)も小泉政権下で主流派として党内で確実に勢力を伸ばし、後に2005年衆議院選挙で当時の最大派閥であった橋本派を抜いて最大派閥に躍り出ることになる。

政策よりも党内の和を最も重視し、それによって出世したともいえる森は、後々までこの加藤の乱に対しての遺恨を持っており、2007年9月に発足した福田康夫政権の幹事長に谷垣禎一を起用することに反対したとされ(幹事長には、派を挙げて福田を支援した伊吹文明が就任し、谷垣は政調会長に落ち着いた)、乱の森へ与えた影響の大きさが垣間見える。

ただ、乱より8年後の2008年6月9日、都内の日本料理店で加藤と会食した。席の上で、加藤は「あの時は迷惑を掛けました」と謝罪し、森と握手して和解している。

不信任決議案における投票行動

賛成(190人)

反対(237人)

欠席(50人)

退場(1人)

本会議に欠席した自民党議員

備考

マスコミの反応

マスコミやマスコミの言うところの国民にとって、最も「分り辛い」点として、現内閣への内閣不信任案に同調しながらも、離党は絶対にしないというロジックが乱中に何度も取り上げられ、加藤本人への突っ込みでも何度も使われた。加藤本人は、「過去に自民党を改革しようとして離党した人たちが度々いたが、一時の盛り上がりだけで、毎度いずれエネルギーを失ってしまっている。結局、改革に繋がらない行動になっている。だから、私たちは中でやる。」という主張を度々繰りかえしたが、マスコミには「それでも分り辛い」と評されていた。

本会議場でのコップ水事件

本会議の演説において松浪健四郎議員が野次に激昂し、壇上からコップの水を掛けるという事件が起こった。

加藤の乱で揺れていた森内閣不信任案決議で、保守党を代表して反対討論を行っている最中、民主党議員から野次られたことを理由に国会の壇上から永田寿康に目掛けてコップを浴びせた(松浪は暴言を吐いたからと主張したが、永田は否定)。野次の内容は「おまえ、党首(=扇千景)と何発やったんだ」である蓋然性が高いとされているが、これは松浪自身が否定している。

水掛けの直後、抗議する野党議員が一斉に演壇に押しかけ大騒ぎとなり、あまりの音量に松浪は耳をふさぎながら早口で草稿を読み上げ演壇から降りた。松浪はこの場で議場からの退場の処分を下され、のちに登院停止処分を受けた。

勘違い?

2007年6月29日、衆議院に安倍内閣不信任決議案が提出された際、加藤は賛成を意味する白票を持って壇上に上がった。「加藤の乱」の再発かと一時危惧されたが、加藤は白票を渡す直前にあわてて自分の席に戻り反対を意味する青票に持ち替えた。

本人曰く、与党議員は法案の採決でよく白票を使うために起きた単なる勘違いであったとのことだが、「本音は賛成だったのではないか」という周りの声もある。

脚注

  1. ^ もし離党に至った際に、加藤派自体《特にベテラン》がついてこないとの計算があったと言われる。派内説得にあたる際も、再三「離党」は絶対に無いと説得している。また、加藤には保守本流という自負が強く、自民党自体を否定していた訳ではない。保守本流の自負心が強いのは他の宏池会ベテランにも言えることなので、離党が派内事情的に非現実的であるという認識があった。
  2. ^ ここが計画的なものだったのか、評論家たちに煽られて突発的に言ったものなのかが真相が明らかになっていない。
  3. ^ 小沢は1993年の内閣不信任決議採決において派閥を率いて不信任票を投じ、その直後の解散総選挙において自民党を離党し、非自民政権を樹立させている。
  4. ^ 過去には1993年の嘘つき解散時の不信任決議採決で2閣僚が辞表を提出した上で不信任票を投じた例がある。
  5. ^ a b c 竹中治堅 『首相支配--日本政治の変貌』 中央公論新社中公新書〉、2006年5月25日、135-136頁。ISBN 4121018451

関連項目

外部リンク

This article is taken from the Japanese Wikipedia Revolt of Kato

This article is distributed by cc-by-sa or GFDL license in accordance with the provisions of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia and Tranpedia does not guarantee the accuracy of this document. See our disclaimer for more information.

In addition, Tranpedia is simply not responsible for any show is only by translating the writings of foreign licenses that are compatible with CC-BY-SA license information.